Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2022
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 8 No. 1 (2011): Winter
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2011)

March 2011

Does Bleeding During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Necessitate keeping the Nephrostomy Tube? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

  • Masoud Etemadian
  • Mohammad Javad Soleimani
  • Ramin Haghighi
  • Mohammad Reza Zeighami
  • Neda Najimi

Urology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1 (2011), 12 March 2011 , Page 21-26
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v8i1.927 Published: 2011-03-12

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To compare outcomes in two groups of patients with kept and discarded nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) complicated with bleeding. Materials and Methods: Two hundred patients who had undergone PCNL complicated with hemorrhage were recruited in this study. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups: group A, who underwent tubeless PCNL and tract port was packed for 3 to 4 minutes after removing Amplatz sheath, and group B, for whom a 24-F nephrostomy tube was left in place at the end of the procedure. Patients were followed up for 3 months to check if bleeding occurred. Results: The mean operation time was 68 ± 4.3 minutes in group A and 74 ± 5.6 minutes in group B (P = .098). The mean stone size was similar in groups A and B (36.26 ± 5.3 mm versus 35.35 ± 5.85 mm; P = .613). The mean hemoglobin drop was 3.65 ± 1.20 g/dL in group A and 3.13 ± 1.06 g/dL in group B. There was no significant difference between the mean of stonefree rate in groups A and B (92.58% ± 5.97 versus 89.60% ± 8.3; P = .210). Patients in group A experienced a significantly less duration of hospitalization than group B (2.42 ± 0.84 days versus 3.70 ± 0.80 days; P < .001). Conclusion: In the absence of clear indication, nephrostomy tube insertion after PCNL does not seem to be beneficial, and its removal does not pose patients at any additional risk.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Etemadian, M., Soleimani, M. J., Haghighi, R., Zeighami, M. R., & Najimi, N. (2011). Does Bleeding During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Necessitate keeping the Nephrostomy Tube? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Urology Journal, 8(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v8i1.927
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 220 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 436 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact