Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 23 No. 04 (2026): July-August 2026
  4. REVIEW

Vol. 23 No. 04 (2026)

September 2026

Ileum vs Colon for Neobladder Reconstruction After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Yakui Li
  • Yu Liu

Urology Journal, Vol. 23 No. 04 (2026), 20 September 2026 , Page 122-132
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v23i04.8695 Published: 2026-09-20

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare and evaluate the functional outcomes and safety of ileal neobladder and
colonic neobladder (sigmoid and ileocecal subtypes) after radical cystectomy.
Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and
Embase following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Subgroup analyses compared ileal neobladder with sigmoid neobladder and ileocecal neobladder. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and evidence certainty was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Continuous and dichotomous variables were analyzed using weighted mean differences and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Seventeen studies (one randomized controlled trial and 16 cohort studies) were included. Early postoperative complications were significantly less frequent with ileal neobladder than with sigmoid neobladder, with no significant difference between ileal and ileocecal neobladders. Late complications and daytime continence were comparable among all groups. Ileal neobladder achieved significantly superior nighttime continence compared with colonic neobladders. However, ileal neobladder was associated with higher postvoid residual urine volume and higher clean intermittent catheterization rates than sigmoid neobladder, with similar voiding outcomes between ileal and ileocecal neobladders.
Conclusion: Ileal neobladder provides superior nighttime urinary continence and lower early complication rates
compared with sigmoid neobladder, whereas sigmoid neobladder provides better spontaneous voiding performance. Given the observational nature of available evidence and notable heterogeneity, no single pouch type is universally superior, and individualized surgical selection is recommended.

Keywords:
  • ileal neobladder; colon neobladder; sigmoid neobladder; ileocecal neobladder; bladder cancer
  • 8695/pdf

How to Cite

Li, Y., & Liu, Y. (2026). Ileum vs Colon for Neobladder Reconstruction After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urology Journal, 23(04), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v23i04.8695
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

References

Dobruch J, Oszczudlowski M. Bladder Cancer: Current Challenges and Future Directions. Medicina. Jul 24 2021;57(8)doi:10.3390/medicina57080749

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. Jan 2023;73(1):17-48. doi:10.3322/caac.21763

Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Brundl J, et al. Prognosis of Primary Papillary Ta Grade 3 Bladder Cancer in the Non-muscle-invasive Spectrum. European urology oncology. Apr 2023;6(2):214-221. doi:10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.004

Claps F, van de Kamp MW, Mayr R, et al. Risk factors associated with positive surgical margins' location at radical cystectomy and their impact on bladder cancer survival. World journal of urology. Dec 2021;39(12):4363-4371. doi:10.1007/s00345-021-03776-5

Claps F, van de Kamp MW, Mayr R, et al. Prognostic impact of variant histologies in urothelial bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. BJU international. Aug 2023;132(2):170-180. doi:10.1111/bju.15984

Reddy PK, Lange PH, Fraley EE. Total bladder replacement using detubularized sigmoid colon: technique and results. The Journal of urology. Jan 1991;145(1):51-5. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38245-9

Krupski T, Theodorescu D. Orthotopic neobladder following cystectomy: indications, management, and outcomes. Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. Jan 2001;28(1):37-46. doi:10.1067/mjw.2001.112084

Badawy AA, Abolyosr A, Mohamed ER, Abuzeid AM. Orthotopic diversion after cystectomy in women: A single-centre experience with a 10-year follow-up. Arab journal of urology. Dec 2011;9(4):267-71. doi:10.1016/j.aju.2011.10.007

Sanyal SR, Kodituwakku K, Nagra D, Gupta M, Nisreen A, Mohamed K. Spectrum of imaging manifestations of tumour recurrences in orthotopic neobladder. The British journal of radiology. Dec 2021;94(1128):20210660. doi:10.1259/bjr.20210660

Stein R, Hohenfellner M, Pahernik S, Roth S, Thuroff JW, Rubben H. Urinary diversion--approaches and consequences. Deutsches Arzteblatt international. Sep 2012;109(38):617-22. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2012.0617

Ardelt PU, Woodhouse CR, Riedmiller H, Gerharz EW. The efferent segment in continent cutaneous urinary diversion: a comprehensive review of the literature. BJU international. Jan 2012;109(2):288-97. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10242.x

Philip J, Manikandan R, Venugopal S, Desouza J, Javle PM. Orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit urinary diversion after cystectomy--a quality-of-life based comparison. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Oct 2009;91(7):565-9. doi:10.1308/003588409X432293

Hobisch A, Tosun K, Kinzl J, et al. Quality of life after cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit urinary diversion. World journal of urology. Oct 2000;18(5):338-44. doi:10.1007/s003450000147

Erber B, Schrader M, Miller K, et al. Morbidity and Quality of Life in Bladder Cancer Patients following Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion: A Single-Institution Comparison of Ileal Conduit versus Orthotopic Neobladder. ISRN urology. 2012;2012:342796. doi:10.5402/2012/342796

!!! INVALID CITATION !!!;

Santucci RA, Park CH, Mayo ME, Lange PH. Continence and urodynamic parameters of continent urinary reservoirs: comparison of gastric, ileal, ileocolic, right colon, and sigmoid segments. Urology. Aug 1999;54(2):252-7. doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00098-9

Kato M, Takeda A, Saito S, et al. Long-term functional outcomes of ileal and sigmoid orthotopic neobladder procedures. Urology. Jan 2007;69(1):74-7. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.023

Chang DT, Lawrentschuk N. Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction. Urology annals. Jan-Mar 2015;7(1):1-7. doi:10.4103/0974-7796.148553

Guan Z, Li J, Yang R. [Impacts of different grafts for bladder reconstruction on postoperative recovery of the patients]. Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University. Aug 2013;33(8):1250-2.

Kulkarni JN, Pramesh CS, Rathi S, Pantvaidya GH. Long-term results of orthotopic neobladder reconstruction after radical cystectomy. BJU international. Apr 2003;91(6):485-8. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04131.x

Herdiman O, Ong K, Johnson L, Lawrentschuk N. Orthotopic bladder substitution (Neobladder): part II: postoperative complications, management, and long-term follow-up. Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. Mar-Apr 2013;40(2):171-80; quiz E1-2. doi:10.1097/WON.0b013e31827e8499

Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG. Lessons learned from 1,000 neobladders: the 90-day complication rate. The Journal of urology. Sep 2010;184(3):990-4; quiz 1235. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.037

Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG. 25 years of experience with 1,000 neobladders: long-term complications. The Journal of urology. Jun 2011;185(6):2207-12. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.006

Ma JL, Hennessey DB, Newell BP, Bolton DM, Lawrentschuk N. Radiotherapy-related complications presenting to a urology department: a more common problem than previously thought? BJU international. May 2018;121 Suppl 3:28-32. doi:10.1111/bju.14145

Stein R, Schroder A, Thuroff JW. Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion in patients with neurogenic bladder: non-surgical considerations. Journal of pediatric urology. Apr 2012;8(2):145-52. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.03.015

Thorstenson A, Jacobsson H, Onelov E, Holst JJ, Hellstrom PM, Kinn AC. Gastrointestinal function and metabolic control after construction of an orthotopic ileal neobladder in bladder cancer. Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. 2007;41(1):14-9. doi:10.1080/00365590600911217

Kato M, Takeda A, Saito S, et al. Long-term functional outcomes of ileal and sigmoid orthotopic neobladder procedures. Urology. Jan 2007;69(1):74-7. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.023

Khafagy M, Shaheed FA, Moneim TA. Ileocaecal vs ileal neobladder after radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer: a comparative study. BJU international. Apr 2006;97(4):799-804. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05996.x

Bassiouny M, Zaghloul AS, El Sherbiny M, Saber N, Abdalla H, Shokry A. Detubularized sigmoid neobladder versus detubularized W-shaped ileal neobladder as a bladder substitute after radical cystectomy for carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a study of 60 patients. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute. Jun 2004;16(2):76-84.

El-Helaly HA, Saifelnasr MK, Mohamed KM, Abdelaziz AS, Youssof HA. Outcome of orthotopic sigmoid versus ileal neobladder reconstruction. Urology annals. Apr-Jun 2019;11(2):204-210. doi:10.4103/UA.UA_137_18

El Baz A, Ismail MA, El Ganzoury H, et al. POD-07.05: Continence and Urodynamic Parameters: Comparison and Long-Term Follow-Up of Orthotopic Sigmoid and Ileal Neobladders. Urology. 2009;74(4):S22.

Honeck P, Bolenz C, Wendt-Nordahl G, Alken P, Michel MS. Outcome of sigmoid compared to ileal orthotopic bladder substitution in terms of micturition and defecation parameters in an 8-year long-term follow-up. Urologia internationalis. 2009;83(3):277-80. doi:10.1159/000241666

Koraitim MM, Atta MA, Foda MK. Orthotopic bladder substitution in men revisited: identification of continence predictors. The Journal of urology. Nov 2006;176(5):2081-4. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.006

Miyake H, Furukawa J, Sakai I, et al. Orthotopic sigmoid vs. ileal neobladders in Japanese patients: a comparative assessment of complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life. Urologic oncology. Oct 2013;31(7):1155-60. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.11.015

Miyake H, Furukawa J, Takenaka A, Yamanaka N, Fujisawa M. Long-term functional outcomes in patients with various types of orthotopic intestinal neobladder. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. Jul 2008;15(7):612-5. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02085.x

Schrier BP, Laguna MP, van der Pal F, Isorna S, Witjes JA. Comparison of orthotopic sigmoid and ileal neobladders: continence and urodynamic parameters. European urology. May 2005;47(5):679-85. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2004.10.018

Chen Z, Lu G, Li X, et al. Better compliance contributes to better nocturnal continence with orthotopic ileal neobladder than ileocolonic neobladder after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology. Apr 2009;73(4):838-43; discussion 843-4. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.076

Miyake H, Furukawa J, Muramaki M, Inoue T, Fujisawa M. Health related quality of life after radical cystectomy: comparative study between orthotopic sigmoid versus ileal neobladders. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. Nov 2012;38(11):1089-94. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2012.07.117

Abd El-Aziz S. Vaginal reconstruction using the ileocecal segment after resection of pelvic malignancy. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute. Mar 2006;18(1):1-7.

Anderson CB, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Clark PE, Smith JA, Jr., Kaufman MR. Voiding function in women with orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion. The Journal of urology. Jul 2012;188(1):200-4. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.004

Lamin E, Newman DK. Clean intermittent catheterization revisited. International urology and nephrology. Jun 2016;48(6):931-9. doi:10.1007/s11255-016-1236-9

Paananen I, Ohtonen P, Perttila I, et al. Functional results after orthotopic bladder substitution: a prospective multicentre study comparing four types of neobladder. Scandinavian journal of urology. Feb 2014;48(1):90-8. doi:10.3109/21681805.2013.799225

Tao S, Long Z, Zhang XJ, et al. Ileal versus sigmoid neobladder as bladder substitute after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A meta-analysis. International journal of surgery. Mar 2016;27:39-45. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.044

Bhatia NN, Bradley WE, Haldeman S. Urodynamics: continuous monitoring. The Journal of urology. Nov 1982;128(5):963-8. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53303-0

Fujisawa M, Takenaka A, Kamidono S. A new technique for creation of a sigmoid neobladder for urinary reconstruction: clinical outcome in 42 men. Urology. Aug 2003;62(2):254-8. doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00267-x

Hautmann RE, de Petriconi R, Gottfried HW, Kleinschmidt K, Mattes R, Paiss T. The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of followup. The Journal of urology. Feb 1999;161(2):422-7; discussion 427-8. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61909-8

Steven K, Poulsen AL. The orthotopic Kock ileal neobladder: functional results, urodynamic features, complications and survival in 166 men. J Urol. Aug 2000;164(2):288-95.

Tanaka T, Kitamura H, Takahashi A, Masumori N, Itoh N, Tsukamoto T. Long-term functional outcome and late complications of Studer's ileal neobladder. Japanese journal of clinical oncology. Jul 2005;35(7):391-4. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyi112

Xu K, Liu CX, Zheng SB, et al. Orthotopic detaenial sigmoid neobladder after radical cystectomy: technical considerations, complications and functional outcomes. The Journal of urology. Sep 2013;190(3):928-34. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.072

  • Abstract Viewed: 43 times
  • 8695/pdf Downloaded: 41 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus