Comparison of Super Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (smPCNL) and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Pediatric 1-2 cm Kidney Stones: A Single-Center Retrospective Controlled Study
Urology Journal,
Vol. 23 No. 01 (2026),
29 May 2026
,
Page 1-6
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v23i00.8586
Abstract
Purpose: To compare outcomes of super mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (smPCNL) with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for stones 1-2 cm.
Materials and methods: After receiving ethics committee approval for this study (Date: 10/09/2021 Decision No: 2021/10-01), the files of patients who underwent smPCNL and ESWL for kidney stones between January 2017 and June 2021 by the Urology Department of Van YYU Dursun Odabaşı
Medical Center were retrospectively scanned. A total of 300 patients' data were scanned retrospectively. After applying the exclusion criteria and omitting ESWL patients whose sessions were not completed, a total of 159 patients, including 82 in the ESWL group and 77 in the smPCNL group, were included in our study.
Results: The mean age in the ESWL group was 6.72 ± 3.71, and the mean age in the smPCNL group was 6.63 ± 3.59 (range: 1-18 years). There was no significant difference in the age profile between the groups (p = .87). Regarding the direction of the stone procedure in the smPCNL group, the procedure was performed on the right side in 42 patients (54.54%) and on the left side in 35 patients (45.46%). In the ESWL group, the procedure was performed on the right side in 38 patients (46.35%) and on the left side in 44 patients (53.65%). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of side direction (p = .38). The mean body mass index (BMI) in the ESWL group was 20.10 ± 2.01, while it was 20.23 ± 2.05 in the smPCNL group. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of BMI (p =.68). The mean stone size in the ESWL group was calculated as 13.74 ± 1.91 mm (10-20 mm) and 149.75 ± 45.46 mm², which would provide more accurate results. The mean value in the smPCNL group was 14.06 ± 2.6 mm (10-20 mm) and 150.87 ± 50.34 mm². No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of stone size (p(mm)=.37, p(mm²)=.88). Among 82 patients treated with ESWL, 21 (25.6%) were stone-free after the first session, increasing to 40 (48.8%) by the end of the second session, and to 50 (61.0%) at the end of the third session. In terms of sedoanalgesia, 19 patients (23.20%) were exposed to 1 session, 16 (19.5%) were exposed to 2 sessions, and 31 (37.80%) were exposed to 3 sessions. Sixteen (19.5%) patients did not receive anesthesia. When evaluated in terms of the need for re-intervention, it was observed in 22 patients (26.8%) in the ESWL group and 4 patients (5.2%) in the smPCNL group (p = .0003). In the comparison of the stone-free rate of the smPCNL and ESWL groups, a statistically significant difference was observed in both the early and late periods (p = .001). When comparing the early and late periods of smPCNL (p = .79) and ESWL (p = .19) within their own groups, no statistical difference was observed. When smPCNL and ESWL were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification in terms of complications, no statistically significant difference was observed (p = .51).
Conclusion: ESWL remains the preferred first-line option for many pediatric patients due to its safety and non-invasive nature. However, smPCNL provides higher single-session stone-free rates for 10–20 mm renal stones and may reduce repeated anesthesia exposure. SmPCNL should be considered a viable first-line alternative to achieve higher stone-free rates without increasing complication risks. Prospective, multicenter randomized trials are warranted.
- extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
- nephrolithiasis
- super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- kidney stone
How to Cite
References
Akinci M, Esen T, Tellaloğlu S. Urinary stone disease in Turkey: an updated epidemiological study. European urology. 1991;20(3):200-3.
Novak TE, Lakshmanan Y, Trock BJ, Gearhart JP, Matlaga BR. Sex prevalence of pediatric kidney stone disease in the United States: an epidemiologic investigation. Urology. 2009;74(1):104-7.
Rhodes C, Churchill D, Hulton SA. Antenatal diagnosis of fetal renal calculus. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;25(5):517-8.
Sarica K. Pediatric urolithiasis: etiology, specific pathogenesis and medical treatment. Urological research. 2006;34:96-101.
Rizvi SA, Sultan S, Zafar MN, Ahmed B, et al. Evaluation of children with urolithiasis. Indian Journal of Urology. 2007;23(4):420-7.
Sinescu I, Manu R, Manu M, Burchiu E, Chiriac-Babei G, Arion C. 455 LATE FOLLOW-UP OF 268 CHILDREN WITH EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR URINARY LITHIASIS: ANOTHER CONFIRMATION OF ITS EFFICIENCY. European Urology Supplements. 2009;4(8):234.
Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43:563-70.
Dede O, Sancaktutar AA, Dağguli M, Utangaç M, Baş O, Penbegul N. Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric nephrolithiasis: both low pressure and high efficiency. Journal of pediatric urology. 2015;11(5):253. e1-. e6.
Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. European urology. 2016;69(3):475-82.
Smaldone MC, Corcoran AT, Docimo SG, Ost MC. Endourological management of pediatric stone disease: present status. The Journal of urology. 2009;181(1):17-28.
Guven S, Frattini A, Onal B, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. BJU international. 2013;111(1).
Handa RK, Evan AP. A chronic outcome of shock wave lithotripsy is parenchymal fibrosis. Urological research. 2010;38:301-5.
Lingeman JE, Kulb TB. Hypertension following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The Journal of Urology. 1987;137(6):142A-A.
Corbally M, Ryan J, Fitzpatrick J, Fitzgerald R. Renal function following extracorporeal lithotripsy in children. Journal of pediatric surgery. 1991;26(5):539-40.
Telegrafo M, Carluccio DA, Rella L, Ianora AAS, Angelelli G, Moschetta M. Diagnostic and prognostic role of computed tomography in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy complications. Urology annals. 2016;8(2):168-72.
Eaton MP, Erturk EN. Serum troponin levels are not increased in patients with ventricular arrhythmias during shock wave lithotripsy. The Journal of urology. 2003;170(6):2195-7.
HOLMBERG G, SPINNELL S, SJÖDIN J-G. Perforation of the bowel during SWL in prone position. Journal of endourology. 1997;11(5):313-4.
Kim T-B, Park H-K, Lee K-Y, Kim K-H, Jung H, Yoon S-J. Life-threatening complication after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a renal stone: a hepatic subcapsular hematoma. Korean journal of urology. 2010;51(3):212.
Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hartman RE, Izumi Y, et al. Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. Journal of Neuroscience. 2003;23(3):876-82.
Öncel HF, Salar R, Bahçeci T. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stones in pediatric patients: Our 11 years of experience. Journal of Surgery & Medicine (JOSAM). 2022;6(9).
Sarica K, Eryildirim B, Tuerxun A, et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stone smaller than 25 mm in pediatric patients: Could it be an alternative to shockwave lithotripsy? Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 2018;42(6):406-13.
Tan A, Al-Omar M, Watterson J, Nott L, Denstedt J, Razvi H. Results of shockwave lithotripsy for pediatric urolithiasis. Journal of endourology. 2004;18(6):527-30.
Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A, Sarilar O, Binbay M, Altunrende F, Ozkuvanci U. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment alternative for urinary tract stones in children: a large scale retrospective analysis. The Journal of urology. 2003;170(6):2405-8.
Rodrigues Netto N, Longo JA, Ikonomidis JA, Rodrigues Netto M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children. The Journal of urology. 2002;167(5):2164-6.
DEMIRKESEN O, TANSU N, YAYCIOGLU O, ONAL B, YALCIN V, SOLOK V. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the pediatric population. Journal of endourology. 1999;13(3):147-50.
Liu Y, Wu W, Tuerxun A, et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of pediatric nephrolithiasis: evaluation of the initial results. Journal of Endourology. 2017;31(S1):S-38-S-42.
Yuan D, Zhang W, Zhan X, et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduces the incidence of postoperative adverse events in pediatric patients: a retrospective cohort study. Urologia Internationalis. 2019;103(1):81-8.
Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z, et al. Super‐mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. Bju International. 2016;117(4):655-61.
Jia H, Li J, Liu B, et al. Comparison of super-mini-PCNL and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of upper urinary tract calculus (1–2 cm) in children. World journal of urology. 2021;39:195-200.
Bilen CY, Koçak B, Kıtırcı G, Özkaya O, Sarıkaya Ş. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: lessons learned in 5 years at a single institution. The Journal of urology. 2007;177(5):1867-71.
- Abstract Viewed: 193 times
- 8586/pdf Downloaded: 81 times