Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 22 No. 06 (2025): November-December 2025
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 22 No. 06 (2025)

January 2026

Totally Ultrasound-Guided Supine Mini-PCNL Without Ureteral Catheter in Hydronephrotic Kidney; A Matched-Pair Analysis

  • Cengiz çanakcı
  • Orkunt özkaptan
  • Erdinç Dinçer
  • Utku Can
  • Kubilay Can çağlar
  • Oğuz Türkyılmaz

Urology Journal, Vol. 22 No. 06 (2025), 11 January 2026 , Page 283-288
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v22i.8519 Published: 2026-01-11

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the safety and efficacy of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed completely under ultrasound guidance without fluoroscopy and ureteral catheterization in kidneys with hydronephrosis.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the data of 30 patients (Group 1) with kidney stones larger than 2 cm and Grade 2 or higher hydronephrosis who underwent ultrasound-guided supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ureteral catheterization and fluoroscopy between January 2022 and November 2024. The data of these patients were compared using matched-pair analysis (1:1) with patients who underwent supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance with ureteral catheterization (Group 2) in the same period. The groups were compared regarding access time, operation time, stone-free rates, blood loss, and complications.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, side, stone diameter, stone volume, stone density, hydronephrosis grade and Guy's stone score. Access time was significantly shorter in Group 1  (11.3 ± 3.9 minutes vs. 13.9 ± 4.7 minutes, respectively, 95% CI: 0.3-4.9, p = .026). The mean operation time was 64.4 ± 19.4 in Group 1 and 102.3 ± 31.2 in Group 2, and this difference was statistically significant (95% CI: 24.2-51.6, p = .001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative 1st month stone-free rates (83.3% vs 86.6%, respectively, p = .723

Conclusion: Compared with standard supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy, totally ultrasound guided supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ureteral catheter is an effective, safe and feasible surgery.

Keywords:
  • Fluoroscopy
  • percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • Ultrasound
  • ureteral catheter
  • 8519-pdf

How to Cite

çanakcı, C., özkaptan, O., Dinçer, E., Can, U., çağlar, K. C., & Türkyılmaz, O. (2026). Totally Ultrasound-Guided Supine Mini-PCNL Without Ureteral Catheter in Hydronephrotic Kidney; A Matched-Pair Analysis. Urology Journal, 22(06), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v22i.8519
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR. Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Sep;58(5):299-306. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.299.

Wang K, Zhang P, Xu X, Fan M. Ultrasonographic versus Fluoroscopic Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2015;95(1):15-25. doi: 10.1159/000369216.

Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475–82.

Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, et al. Surgical Management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol. 2016;196:1153–60.

Ding M, Zhu K, Zhang W, et al. Comparing Balloon Dilation to Non-Balloon Dilation for Access in Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2024;50:7-19.

Yang YH, Wen YC, Chen KC, Chen C. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2019;37:777-788.

El-Shaer W, Kandeel W, Abdel-Lateef S, Torky A, Elshaer A. Complete Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone and Supine Positions: A Randomized Controlled Study. Urology. 2019;128:31-37.

Hosseini MM, Yousefi A, Rastegari M. Pure ultrasonography-guided radiation-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy: report of 357 cases. Springerplus. 2015;4:313.

Hosseini SR, Gholamnejad M, Mohseni MG, Abhari AP, Aghamir SMK. Comparison of Combined Guidance of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasonography in Total Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with the Standard Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Urol J. 2024;21:140-145.

Eryildirim B, Tuncer M, Camur E, Ustun F, Tarhan F, Sarica K. Renal access in PNL under sonographic guidance: Do we really need to insert an open end ureteral catheter in dilated renal systems? A prospective randomized study. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017;89:226-231.

Tabibi A, Akhavizadegan H, Nouri Mahdavi K, Najafi Semnani M, Karbakhsh Davari M, Niroomand AR. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without retrograde pyelography: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Urol J. 2005;2:132-5.

Fu X, Hu W, Deng W, et al. Total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter for the treatment of kidney stone patients without hydronephrosis: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Oct 23. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04252-w.

Zhang X, Zhu Z, Shen D, Cao X, Cao X. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy without indwelling ureteral catheter in older adults with upper urinary calculi: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101:e31285.

Li X, Tan Z, Yu Y, Zhou X, Xi H, Liu W. No ureteral catheter mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (NUC-mPCNL) achieves enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Sci Rep. 2024;14:27129.

Li J, Gao L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Jiang Q. Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2019;66:62-71.

Valdivia Uría JG, Valle Gerhold J, López López JA, et al. Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol. 1998;160:1975-8.

Bach C, Goyal A, Kumar P, et al. The Barts 'flank-free' modified supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int. 2012;89:365-8.

Birowo P, Raharja PAR, Putra HWK, Rustandi R, Atmoko W, Rasyid N. X-ray-free Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Supine Position Using Alken Metal Telescoping Dilators in a Large Kidney Stone: A Case Report. Res Rep Urol. 2020;12:287-293.

Yang YH, Wen YC, Chen KC, Chen C. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2019;37:777-788.

Falahatkar S, Allahkhah A, Kazemzadeh M, Enshaei A, Shakiba M, Moghaddas F. Complete supine PCNL: ultrasound vs. fluoroscopic guided: a randomized clinical trial. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42:710-6.

Zhu W, Li J, Yuan J, Liu Y, et al. A prospective and randomised trial comparing fluoroscopic, total ultrasonographic, and combined guidance for renal access in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int. 2017;119:612-618.

Maghsoudi R, Etemadian M, Kashi AH, Mehravaran K. Management of Colon Perforation During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: 12 Years of Experience in a Referral Center. J Endourol. 2017;31:1032-1036.

Basiri A, Nouralizadeh A, Kashi AH, Radfar MH, Nasiri MR, Zeinali M, Sarhangnejad R, Hosseini-Sharifi SH. X-Ray Free Minimally Invasive Surgery for Urolithiasis in Pregnancy. Urol J. 2016;13:2496-501

Hur KJ, Moon HW, Kang SM, Kim KS, Choi YS, Cho H. Incidence of posterolateral and retrorenal colon in supine and prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis. 2021;49:585-590.

  • Abstract Viewed: 273 times
  • 8519-pdf Downloaded: 53 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus