Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 7 No. 4 (2010): Autumn
  4. UNCLASSIFIED

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2010)

December 2010

Open Prostatectomy Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, Where Are We Standing in the New Era? A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Nasser Simforoosh
  • Hamidreza Abdi
  • Amir Hossein Kashi
  • Samad Zare
  • Ali Tabibi
  • Abdolkarim Danesh
  • Abbas Basiri
  • Seyed Amir Mohsen Ziaee

Urology Journal, Vol. 7 No. 4 (2010), 14 December 2010 , Page 262-269
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v7i4.825 Published: 2010-12-13

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To compare peri-operative and short-term complications of open transvesical prostatectomy (OP) as well as its functional outcomes with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in management of benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostates sized 30 to 70 g. Materials and Methods: Hundred patients who were candidate for the prostate surgery with prostates between 30 to 70 g randomly underwent OP or TURP. Secondary endpoints included international prostate symptom score, residual urine volume, surgical complications, and patients’ quality of life. Patients were followed up for 6 to 12 months after the operation. Results: Fifty-one and 49 patients underwent OP and TURP, respectively. Median (interquartile range) of peak flow rate improvement was 11.1 (7.6 to 14.2) and 8.0 (2.2 to 12.6) in OP and TURP groups, respectively (P = .02). International prostate symptom score improvement did not reveal statistically significant difference between treatment groups. Re-operation due to residual prostate lobe, urethral stricture, and urinary retention was performed

in 8 patients in TURP group versus no patient in OP group (P = .006). Dysuria was more frequent in patients that underwent TURP (P < .001). Hospitalization duration was slightly longer in patients that underwent OP (P = .04). Patients’ quality of life was better in the OP group (P = .04). Conclusion: Open transvesical prostatectomy is an acceptable operation for the prostates sized 30 to 70 g. Higher peak flow rate improvement, better quality of life, less frequent dysuria, less need to re-operation, and its ease of learning make open prostatectomy a suitable option to be discussed in patients parallel to TURP.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Simforoosh, N., Abdi, H., Kashi, A. H., Zare, S., Tabibi, A., Danesh, A., … Ziaee, S. A. M. (2010). Open Prostatectomy Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, Where Are We Standing in the New Era? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology Journal, 7(4), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v7i4.825
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 629 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 1881 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus