The Efficacy of Active Fistulation in Duckett Procedure for Proximal Hypospadias in Children
Urology Journal,
Vol. 21 (2024),
8 May 2024
,
Page 8064
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v21i.8064
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the efficacy of active fistulation in the treatment of proximal hypospadias in children by comparing one-stage and two-stage Duckett procedure.
Materials and Methods: A total of sixty-seven children who were diagnosed with proximal hypospadias and underwent Duckett operation at our hospital between January 2013 and January 2021 were selected for this study. These subjects were divided into two groups: the research group (n=36), using two-stage Duckett procedure with active fistulation, and the control group (n=31), using one-stage Duckett procedure. The incidence of postoperative complications and the score of pediatric penile perception Scale were compared between the two groups.
Results: The research group exhibits significantly lower incidence rate of urethral fistula (8.3% Vs 16.1%) and urethral stricture (5.6% Vs 12.9%) in comparison to the control group (P<0.01). Furthermore, the analysis of Pediatric Penile Perception Scale scores indicates that the research group achieves significantly higher scores in terms of urethral shape, penile skin shape, and overall appearance than the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion: In the treatment of proximal hypospadias in children, The active fistulation within the two-stage Duckett procedure significantly reduces the rate of stage 1 postoperative complications and improves parental satisfaction. The active fistulation may offer a more promising option for the treatment of proximal hypospadias in children.
- Hypospadias urethra; urethroplasty; active fistulas; pediatric patient; two-stage duckett
How to Cite
References
Wood D, Wilcox D. Hypospadias: lessons learned. An overview of incidence, epidemiology, surgery, research, complications, and outcomes. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35:61-6.
Zhou G, Xu W, Yin J, et al. Single-stage versus staged interposition urethroplasty for glandular hypospadias with severe penile curvature: 15-year experience. World J Urol. 2022;40:155-60.
Weber DM, Landolt MA, Gobet R, et al. The Penile Perception Score: an instrument enabling evaluation by surgeons and patient self-assessment after hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2013;189:189-93.
Bhatia VP, Mittal AG, Austin PF, et al. The hypospadias-specific health-related quality of life conceptual framework: a scoping review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2021;30:1537-46.
Springer A, Krois W, Horcher E. Trends in hypospadias surgery: results of a worldwide survey. Eur Urol. 2011;60:1184-9.
Long CJ, Canning DA. Hypospadias: Are we as good as we think when we correct proximal hypospadias? J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12:196.e1-5.
Babu R, Chandrasekharam VVS. Meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of single stage (foreskin pedicled tube) versus two stage (foreskin free graft & foreskin pedicled flap) repair for proximal hypospadias in the last decade. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17:681-9.
Duckett JW, Jr. Transverse preputial island flap technique for repair of severe hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am. 1980;7:423-30.
Khan M, Majeed A, Hayat W, et al. Hypospadias repair: a single centre experience. Plast Surg Int. 2014;2014:453039.
Chen C, Yang TQ, Chen JB, et al. The Effect of Staged Transverse Preputial Island Flap Urethroplasty for Proximal Hypospadias with Severe Chordee. J Urol. 2016;196:1536-40.
Cimador M, Vallasciani S, Manzoni G, et al. Failed hypospadias in paediatric patients. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10:657-66.
Cousin I, Basmaison C, Cousin E, et al. Complication rates of proximal hypospadias: meta-analyses of four surgical repairs. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18:587-97.
Zhang Y, Wang X, Wu Y, et al. Grafts vs. flaps: a comparative study of Bracka repair and staged transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias with severe ventral curvature. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1214464.
Bhat A, Bhat M, Kumar V, et al. Comparison of variables affecting the surgical outcomes of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in adult and pediatric hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12:108.e1-7.
Reinhold C, Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1285-95.
Radojicic ZI, Perovic SV, Djordjevic ML, et al. 'Pseudospongioplasty' in the repair of a urethral diverticulum. BJU Int. 2004;94:126-30.
Snyder CL, Evangelidis A, Snyder RP, et al. Management of urethral diverticulum complicating hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2005;1:81-3.
Castagnetti M, El-Ghoneimi A. Surgical management of primary severe hypospadias in children: an update focusing on penile curvature. Nat Rev Urol. 2022;19:147-60.
Thiry S, Saussez T, Dormeus S, et al. Long-Term Functional, Cosmetic and Sexual Outcomes of Hypospadias Correction Performed in Childhood. Urol Int. 2015;95:137-41.
- Abstract Viewed: 44 times
- Just Accepted-8064 Downloaded: 15 times