Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 22 No. 04 (2025): July-August2025
  4. REVIEW

Vol. 22 No. 04 (2025)

October 2025

Update on Suprapubic Cystostomy Diversion vs. Primary Realignment for the Management of Blunt Posterior Urethral Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Jian-Hua Wen
  • Shao-Jun Jiang

Urology Journal, Vol. 22 No. 04 (2025), 8 October 2025 , Page 169-175
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v22i.8061 Published: 2025-08-10

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: This paper reviewed studies comparing the effectiveness of primary urethral realignment (PUR) and suprapubic cystostomy diversion (SCD) in the early treatment of blunt posterior urethral injuries (PUI).

Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review of original studies that directly compared the incidence of urethral strictures (US), urinary incontinence (UI), and erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients receiving primary management for pelvic fracture posterior urethral injuries with PUR versus SCD. We used Review Manager 5.3 for statistical analysis.

Results: The initial search yielded 205 articles, and 14 met the inclusion criteria for the final systematic review. Meta-analysis showed that PUR was significantly more effective than SCD in reducing the proportion of US in the 365 and 335 cases of PUR and SCD, respectively (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.22, p < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between PUR and SCD in the incidence of UI (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.33-1.11) or ED (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45-1.11).

Conclusion: PUR is more effective than SCD in reducing the incidence of US in patients with pelvic fracture posterior urethral injuries. However, there was no significant difference between PUR and SCD in the incidence of UI or ED.

Keywords:
  • Suprapubic Cystostomy , Primary Realignment , Blunt Posterior Urethral Injuries
  • 8061/pdf

How to Cite

Wen, J.-H., & Jiang, S.-J. (2025). Update on Suprapubic Cystostomy Diversion vs. Primary Realignment for the Management of Blunt Posterior Urethral Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urology Journal, 22(04), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v22i.8061
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Koraitim M M. Pelvic fracture urethral injuries: the unresolved controversy. The Journal of urology. 1999; 161: 1433-1441.

Koraitim M M. Pelvic fracture urethral injuries: evaluation of various methods of management. The Journal of urology. 1996; 156: 1288-1291.

Guille F, Cippola, B, el Khader, K, et al. Early endoscopic realignment for complete traumatic rupture of the posterior urethra--21 patients. Acta urologica Belgica. 1998; 66: 55-58.

Basta A M, Blackmore, C C, and Wessells, H. Predicting urethral injury from pelvic fracture patterns in male patients with blunt trauma. The Journal of urology. 2007; 177: 571-575.

Bjurlin M A, Fantus, R J, Mellett, M M, et al. Genitourinary injuries in pelvic fracture morbidity and mortality using the National Trauma Data Bank. The Journal of trauma. 2009; 67: 1033-1039.

Hadjizacharia P, Inaba, K, Teixeira, P G, et al. Evaluation of immediate endoscopic realignment as a treatment modality for traumatic urethral injuries. The Journal of trauma. 2008; 64: 1443-1449; discussion 1449-1450.

Chang P C, Hsu, Y C, Shee, J J, et al. Early endoscopic primary realignment decreases stricture formation and reduces medical costs in traumatic complete posterior urethral disruption in a 2-year follow-up. Chang Gung medical journal. 2011; 34: 179-185.

Abdalla M A, Ibrahim, T M, and Abdel Latif, A M. Initial management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction injury: Urethral realignment versus suprapubic tube. European Urology, Supplements. 2015; 14: e340.

Chen L, Yang, J, Hu, H F, et al. Re: Primary Endoscopic Realignment of Urethral Disruption Injuries-A Double-Edged Sword?: N. V. Johnsen, R. R. Dmochowski, S. Mock, W. S. Reynolds, D. F. Milam and M. R. Kaufman J Urol 2015;194:1022-1026. The Journal of urology. 2015:

Barrett K, Braga, L H, Farrokhyar, F, et al. Primary realignment vs suprapubic cystostomy for the management of pelvic fracture-associated urethral injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology. 2014; 83: 924-929.

Scott J F, Tausch, T J, Simhan, J, et al. Unintended negative consequences of primary endoscopic realignment for men with pelvic fracture urethral injuries. The Journal of urology. 2014; 191: e492.

Phillips B, Ball, C, Sackett, D, et al. (2013) Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine-levels of evidence (March 2009). Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Web site.http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025. Accessed May 28.

Wells G, Shea, B, O’Connell, D, et al. (2013) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteWebsite. http://www.hri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed May 28.

Mouraviev V B, Coburn, M, and Santucci, R A. The treatment of posterior urethral disruption associated with pelvic fractures: comparative experience of early realignment versus delayed urethroplasty. The Journal of urology. 2005; 173: 873-876.

Ku J, Kim, M E, Jeon, Y S, et al. Management of bulbous urethral disruption by blunt external trauma: the sooner, the better? Urology. 2002; 60: 579-583.

Asci R, Sarikaya, S, Buyukalpelli, R, et al. Voiding and sexual dysfunctions after pelvic fracture urethral injuries treated with either initial cystostomy and delayed urethroplasty or immediate primary urethral realignment. Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. 1999; 33: 228-233.

Follis H W, Koch, M O, and McDougal, W S. Immediate management of prostatomembranous urethral disruptions. The Journal of urology. 1992; 147: 1259-1262.

Husmann D A, Wilson, W T, Boone, T B, et al. Prostatomembranous urethral disruptions: management by suprapubic cystostomy and delayed urethroplasty. The Journal of urology. 1990; 144: 76-78.

Webster G D, Mathes, G L, and Selli, C. Prostatomembranous urethral injuries: a review of the literature and a rational approach to their management. The Journal of urology. 1983; 130: 898-902.

Zhu L Z, Liu, L L, Cai, C Y, et al. [Surgical selection and efficacy assessment for membranous urethral trauma caused by pelvic fracture]. Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology. 2012; 25: 684-686.

Podesta M L, Medel, R, Castera, R, et al. Immediate management of posterior urethral disruptions due to pelvic fracture: therapeutic alternatives. The Journal of urology. 1997; 157: 1444-1448.

Balkan E, Kilic, N, and Dogruyol, H. The effectiveness of early primary realignment in children with posterior urethral injury. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2005; 12: 62-66.

Johnsen N V, Dmochowski, R R, Mock, S, et al. Primary Endoscopic Realignment of Urethral Disruption Injuries--A Double-Edged Sword? The Journal of urology. 2015; 194: 1022-1026.

Olapade-Olaopa E O, Atalabi, O M, Adekanye, A O, et al. Early endoscopic realignment of traumatic anterior and posterior urethral disruptions under caudal anaesthesia - a 5-year review. International journal of clinical practice. 2010; 64: 6-12.

Leddy L S, Vanni, A J, Wessells, H, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic realignment of pelvic fracture associated urethral injuries at a level 1 trauma center. The Journal of urology. 2012; 188: 174-178.

Kim F J, Pompeo, A, Sehrt, D, et al. Early effectiveness of endoscopic posterior urethra primary alignment. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2013; 75: 189-194.

Herschorn S, Thijssen, A, and Radomski, S B. The value of immediate or early catheterization of the traumatized posterior urethra. The Journal of urology. 1992; 148: 1428-1431.

Londergan T A, Gundersen, L H, and van Every, M J. Early fluoroscopic realignment for traumatic urethral injuries. Urology. 1997; 49: 101-103.

Olapade-Olaopa E, Adebayo, S, Atalabi, O, et al. Rigid retrograde endoscopy under regional aneasthesia: a novel technique for the early realignment of traumatic posterior urethral disruption. African journal of medicine and medical sciences. 2002; 31: 277-280.

Jepson B R, Boullier, J A, Moore, R G, et al. Traumatic posterior urethral injury and early primary endoscopic realignment: evaluation of long-term follow-up. Urology. 1999; 53: 1205-1210.

Coffield K S, and Weems, W L. Experience with management of posterior urethral injury associated with pelvic fracture. The Journal of urology. 1977; 117: 722-724.

Moudouni S M, Patard, J J, Manunta, A, et al. Early endoscopic realignment of post-traumatic posterior urethral disruption. Urology. 2001; 57: 628-632.

Sofer M, Mabjeesh, N J, Ben-Chaim, J, et al. Long-term results of early endoscopic realignment of complete posterior urethral disruption. Journal of endourology / Endourological Society. 2010; 24: 1117-1121.

Warner J N, and Santucci, R A. The management of the acute setting of pelvic fracture urethral injury (realignment vs. suprapubic cystostomy alone). Arab journal of urology. 2015; 13: 7-12.

Elliott D S, and Barrett, D M. Long-term followup and evaluation of primary realignment of posterior urethral disruptions. The Journal of urology. 1997; 157: 814-816.

Kizer W S, Armenakas, N A, Brandes, S B, et al. Simplified reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption defects: limited role of supracrural rerouting. The Journal of urology. 2007; 177: 1378-1381; discussion 1381-1372.

Melekos M D, Pantazakos, A, Daouaher, H, et al. Primary endourologic re-establishment of urethal continuity after disruption of prostatomembranous urethra. Urology. 1992; 39: 135-138.

  • Abstract Viewed: 505 times
  • 8061/pdf Downloaded: 183 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus