Frenulum Protection Technique in Disposable Circumcision Suture Device for Adult Males
Urology Journal,
Vol. 20 No. 06 (2023),
26 Dey 2023
,
Page 424-428
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7788
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of frenulum protection technique of the disposable
circumcision suture device (DCSD) in adult males.
Materials and Methods: Atotal of 53 adult males were diagnosed with redundant prepuce and underwent circumcision with DCSD using frenulum protection technique. The main preoperative and postoperative measure of the length of penile frenulum was evaluated. Other data such as edema rate, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative pain, staple falling off time, incision infection rate, and evaluation of satisfaction rate with penis
appearance were documented in the study.
Results: There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative frenulum length for each patient.
The mean length of the penile frenulum before and after surgery was 2.25 ± 0.36 cm and 2.23 ± 0.39 cm, respectively (p = .31). The rate of frenulum length preservation was 100%. All the patients had no excessive resection of the frenulum and no serious complication happened after surgery. The satisfaction rate of postoperative penis appearance from patients’ evaluation was 98.1% (52/53).
Conclusion: The frenulum protection technique was simple and operable, which could help the operator to accurately identify the most distal position of the frenulum and retain a sufficient
length of frenulum during DCSD circumcision.
- short frenulum, circumcision, disposable circumcision suture device, frenulum protection technique
How to Cite
References
Brian JM, John NK, Jeffrey DK. CDC's Male Circumcision Recommendations Represent a Key Public Health Measure. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5:15–27.
Carmine P, Mario F, Antonio G, et al. Circumferential dissection of deep fascia as ancillary technique in circumcision: is it possible to correct phimosis increasing penis size? BMC Urol. 2021;21:15.
Jonas ZH, Ricardo T, Carlos T, et al. Prevalence of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision for HIV Infection Prevention — Chókwè District, Mozambique, 2014–2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:942–946.
Adhikarimayum LS, Joseph H, Mudit T. Circumcision as an Intervening Strategy against HIV Acquisition in the Male Genital Tract. Pathogens. 2021;10: 806.
Sinja K, Carina B, Ake S, et al. Penile intraepithelial neoplasia, penile cancer precursors and human papillomavirus prevalence in symptomatic preputium: a cross‐sectional study of 351 circumcised men in Sweden. BJU Int. 2021;127:428–434.
Wei J, Jiali F, Wenliang G, et al. A Modified Pressure Dressing to Avoid Severe Bleeding After Circumcision With a Disposable Circumcision Suture Device and a Discussion on the Mechanism of Bleeding With the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device. SexMed. 2021;9:100288.
Jianming R, He H, Tao C, et al. Modifified circumcision using the disposable circumcision suture device in children: a randomized controlled trial. Urology.2020;143:206-211.
Zhongchao H, Gang L, Xiaoyan L, et al. Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta analysis. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2017;19:362–367.
Haitao W, Ningjie C, Ran H,et al. Evaluation of clinical curative effects of disposable stitching instrument in redundant prepuce patients. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14:298–302.
Peter W. Male dyspareunia due to short frenulum: an indication for adult circumcision. Br Med J. 1977;2:1633–1634.
.Luigi G, Sisto P, Antonio G. The role of short frenulum and the effects of frenulectomy on premature ejaculation. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1269-76.
.Sakir O, Murat D, and Sedat E. The effect of post-circumcision mucosal cuff length on premature ejaculation. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020;14:9–12.
Bo S, Zhiming C. Possible function of the frenulum of prepuce in penile erection. Andrologia. 2012;44:23-5.
Kostis G. Male dyspareunia due to short frenulum: the suture-free, "pull and burn" method. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2611-4.
Hu H, Dawei X, Xiaoguang Z, et al. Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study. International Braz J Urol. 2017;43:736-745.
Bodong L, Shigeng Z, Xuanwen Z, et al. Disposable circumcision suture device: clinical effect and patient satisfaction. Asian J Andrology. 2014;16:453–456.
Miao L, Xiaojie A, Weiguo C, et al. A Modified Disposable Circumcision Suture Device with Application of Plastic Sheet to Avoid Severe Bleeding After Circumcision. Urology J. 2022;19:152-156.
Jingen W, Yongfei Z, Shuxia X, et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel disposable circumcision device: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial at 2 centers. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:454-462.
Minqiang S,Tianli S, ronghua Y, et al. Abnormally short frenulum induced by circumcision with the disposable circumcision suture device: Causes and improvement of the surgical method. National Journal of Andrology. 2020;26:1096-1100.
- Abstract Viewed: 829 times
- 7788/pdf Downloaded: 460 times