Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 21 No. 02 (2024): March-April 2024
  4. UNCLASSIFIED

Vol. 21 No. 02 (2024)

March 2024

Comparison of Postoperative Stress Urinary Incontinence between Anteroposterior Dissection and Modified Gilling Method in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

  • Toshihide Shishido
  • Yosuke Hirasawa
  • Takeshi Kashima
  • Takeshi Hashimoto
  • Naoya Satake
  • Kenjiro Hayashi
  • Taku Aizawa
  • Kazuharu Harada
  • Masataka Taguri
  • Yoshio Ohno

Urology Journal, Vol. 21 No. 02 (2024), 24 March 2024 , Page 133-139
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7746 Published: 2024-03-24

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: Few studies have evaluated the usefulness of anteroposterior dissection holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Thus, this study investigated the incidence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after HoLEP and usefulness of anteroposterior dissection HoLEP in preventing postoperative SUI.

Materials and Methods: In total, 288 patients who underwent HoLEP performed by a single experienced surgeon between May 2014 and September 2021 were enrolled. Furthermore, 134 patients underwent retrograde dissection using the modified Gilling method (surgery 1) and 154 patients underwent anteroposterior dissection HoLEP (surgery 2). The risk factors for SUI, as well as the rates of SUI improvement for the two surgical procedures, were evaluated.

Results: Postoperative SUI was observed in 58 (20.1%) of 288 patients, of whom, 48 (82.8%) recovered continence within 6 months. Ten patients (17.2%) required more than 6 months to recover continence. SUI incidence 1 month after HoLEP was 29.9% (40/134 patients) for surgery 1 and 11.7% (18/154 patients) for surgery 2; a statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.311; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.168–0.575; p < 0.001). In addition, surgery 2 was significantly associated with early recovery from SUI compared with surgery 1 (stratified hazard ratio, 0.782; 95% CI, 0.615–­­­­­0.995; p < 0.001). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that only surgical procedure (OR, 0.350; 95%CI, 0.168–0.732; p=0.005) was an independent predictor of SUI.­

Conclusion: We reaffirmed that anteroposterior dissection HoLEP is a useful procedure for reducing the risk of postoperative SUI and early recovery of urinary continence.

Keywords:
  • benign prostatic hyperplasia; enucleation; holmium laser; urinary incontinence
  • 7746/pdf

How to Cite

Shishido, T., Hirasawa, Y., Kashima, T., Hashimoto, T., Satake, N., Hayashi, K., … Ohno, Y. (2024). Comparison of Postoperative Stress Urinary Incontinence between Anteroposterior Dissection and Modified Gilling Method in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate. Urology Journal, 21(02), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7746
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Gilling PJ, Kennett K, Das AK, Thompson D, Fraundorfer MR. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) combined with transurethral tissue morcellation: an update on the early clinical experience. J Endourol. 1998;12:457-9.

Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol. 2015;67:1066-96.

Shigemura K, Fujisawa M. Current status of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Int J Urol. 2018;25:206-11.

Ye H, Codas R, Daily T, Badet L, Colombel M, Fassi-Fehri H. Stress urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of prostate: incidence and risk factors. J Mens Health. 2022;18:7-14.

Lerner LB, Tyson MD, Mendoza PJ. Stress incontinence during the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol. 2010;24:1655-8.

Endo F, Shiga Y, Minagawa S, et al. Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP: a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2010;76:1451-5.

Cochetti G, Del Zingaro M, Panciarola M, et al. Safety and efficacy of a modified technique of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Appl Sci. 2021;11:2467.

Gilling PJ. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU Int. 2008;101:131-42.

Myers RP, Goellner JR, Cahill DR. Prostate shape, external striated urethral sphincter and radical prostatectomy: the apical dissection. J Urol. 1987;138:543-50.

Wallner C, Dabhoiwala NF, DeRuiter MC, Lamers WH. The anatomical components of urinary continence. Eur Urol. 2009;55:932-43.

Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167-78.

Shigemura K, Tanaka K, Yamamichi F, Chiba K, Fujisawa M. Comparison of predictive factors for postoperative incontinence of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate by the surgeons’ experience during learning curve. Int Neurourol J. 2016;20:59-68.

Elshal AM, Nabeeh H, Eldemerdash Y, et al. Prospective assessment of learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia using a multidimensional approach. J Urol. 2017;197:1099-1107.

Houssin V, Olivier J, Brenier M et al. Predictive factors of urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a multicentric evaluation. World J Urol. 2021;39:143-148.

Shigemura K, Yamamichi F, Kitagawa K, et al. Does surgeon experience affect operative time, adverse events, and continence outcomes in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? A review of more than 1,000 cases. J Urol. 2017;198:663-70.

Placer J, Gelabert-Mas A, Vallmanya F, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of prostate: outcome and complications of self-taught learning curve. Urology. 2009;73:1042-8.

Guo, F., Xiong, Y., Li, J., A Review of Risk Factors for Predicting Urinary Incontinence after Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines , 2022.10, 77-85.

Naspro R, Bachmann A, Gilling P. et al. A review of the recent evidence (2006–2008) for 532-nm photoselective laser vaporisation and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1345-57.

Burnett AL, Mostwin JL. In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation following major pelvic surgery. J Urol. 1998;160:1301-6.

Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57:179-192.

Gil-Vernet JM, Arango O, Álvarez-Vijande R. Topographic Anatomy and its development in Urology in the 20th Century. The work of Salvador Gil Vernet. Eur J Anat. 2016;20:231-47.

Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T, et al. Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011;60:320-9.

  • Abstract Viewed: 1051 times
  • 7746/pdf Downloaded: 617 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus