Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 21 No. 04 (2024): July-August 2024
  4. LETTER

Vol. 21 No. 04 (2024)

June 2024

Why Discovery of PSA was not Granted a Nobel Prize?

  • Oktay ÖZMAN

Urology Journal, Vol. 21 No. 04 (2024), 9 June 2024 , Page 265-266
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7703 Published: 2024-06-09

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

This essay draws attention to the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) discovery's lack of Nobel Prize acknowledgement despite its significance for prostate cancer (PCa) clinical practice. The Nobel Prize committee gives more weight to discoveries in basic research than to applications in medicine, which may account for PSA's lack of recognition. The prize has been dominated by the identification of cancer-causing viruses. Considering the subject from our -urologists- side, numerous pioneer researchers have uncovered PSA's presence and function, and its overuse in PCa screening has sparked debates about issues like overdiagnosis and overtreatment. We must concur that the factors contributing to PSA's underappreciation include the lack of a clear pioneer in its discovery and the contradictory opinions around its use. As a conclusion, PSA may have to wait for a better application before it receives recognition in the Nobel Prize.

Keywords:
  • prostate-specific antigene
  • Nobel Prize
  • prostate cancer
  • 7703/pdf

How to Cite

ÖZMAN, O. (2024). Why Discovery of PSA was not Granted a Nobel Prize?. Urology Journal, 21(04), 265–266. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7703
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

1. Wehrli FW. On the 2003 Nobel Prize in medicine or physiology awarded to Paul C. Lauterbur and Sir Peter Mansfield. Magn. Reson. Med. 51, 1-3 (2004).
2. Lipsick J. A History of Cancer Research: Tumor Viruses. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 13, a035774 (2021).
3. Huggins C. How Charles Huggins made his Nobel prize winning discovery--in his own words: an historic audio recording. Interviewed by Willard Goodwin and Elmer Bell. Prostate. 72, 1718 (2012).
4. Rao AR, Motiwala HG, Karim OM. The discovery of prostate-specific antigen. BJU Int. 101, 5-10 (2008).
5. Research Corporation. Purified human prostate antigen. https://patents.justia.com/patent/4446122 (1981).
6. Özman O, Talat Z, Erözenci A. Prostat Spesifik Antijen’in Tarihi. Lokman Hekim Dergisi. 9, 184-188 (2019) [In Turkish].
7. Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 157, 120-34 (2012).
8. Fleshner K, Carlsson SV, Roobol MJ. The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA. Nat. Rev. Urol. 14, 26-37 (2017).
9. US Preventive Services Task Force; Grossman DC, et al. Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 319, 1901-1913 (2018).
  • Abstract Viewed: 588 times
  • 7703/pdf Downloaded: 290 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus