Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 7 No. 3 (2010): Summer
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2010)

Shahrivar 2010

Comparison of Intranasal Desmopressin and Intramuscular Tramadol Versus Pethidine in Patients with Renal Colic

  • Samad Hazhir
  • Yadollah Ahmadi Asr Badr
  • Javad Nasiri Darabi

Urology Journal, Vol. 7 No. 3 (2010), 15 Shahrivar 2010 , Page 148-151
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v7i3.741 Published: 2010-09-15

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the safety and efficacy of intranasal desmopressin and intramuscular tramadol versus pethidine for treatment of renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 adult patients who presented with renal colic to the emergency wards were recruited in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg intramuscular tramadol, 40 ?g intranasal desmopressin, or 40 ?g intranasal desmopressin plus 100 mg intramuscular tramadol. The severity of the pain was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale. RESULTS: The studied patients consisted of 49 men and 41 women with the mean age of 35.20 ± 13.26 years (range, 16 to 82 years). There was no statistically significant difference regarding the mean age (F [2, 89] = 2.98, P = .056) and gender differences (x2 = 3.3, df = 2, P = .19) in three groups. There was also no statistically significant difference considering pain relief in 3 studied groups (P = .2). CONCLUSION: We concluded that narcotics such as pethidine cannot be replaced by tramadol in patients with renal colic, but tramadol, desmopressin,or both in combination can reduce pethidine requirement.
  • PDF

How to Cite

Hazhir, S., Ahmadi Asr Badr, Y., & Nasiri Darabi, J. (2010). Comparison of Intranasal Desmopressin and Intramuscular Tramadol Versus Pethidine in Patients with Renal Colic. Urology Journal, 7(3), 148–151. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v7i3.741
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 454 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 475 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus