ISSN: 1735-1308
Instant 2023
Vol. 20 (2023)
Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy: A Single Center Experience with A Long-Term Follow Up
Urology Journal,
Vol. 20 (2023),
,
Page 7381
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7381
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the long-term outcomes and safety of laparoscopic simple prostatectomy.
Material and Methods: Between 2012 and 2019 80 patients with prostates volumes ≥ 80 mL were treated with laparoscopic simple prostatectomy at our department. Uroflowmetry, post void residual volume and standardized questionnaires were assessed pre- and postoperatively.
Perioperative complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Results: The mean specimen weight was 83 grams, and the mean operation time was 156 minutes. At a mean follow-up time of 40 months patients showed a significant improvement of Qmax (P = .002), IPSS (P < .001) and QoL (P < .001). Post void residual volumes decreased significantly.
Complications occurred in 11 patients (13.8%), nine had mild (grade 1 - 2) and two had severe (grade 3b - 4a) complications. One conversion to open surgery due to massive prostatic adherence from previous abscess formation was recorded and one patient needed blood transfusion intraoperatively.
Conclusion: laparoscopic simple prostatectomy is an effective and safe procedure for large volume prostate glands with a significant and stable long term symptoms improvement.
- benign prostate hyperplasia
- laparoscopic
- large prostate
- minimal invasive
- simple prostatectomy
How to Cite
References
Launer BM, McVary KT, Ricke WA, Lloyd GL. The rising worldwide impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2021;127:722-8.
2022 Management of Non-neurogenic Male LUTS - Uroweb (Internet). (cited 2022 May 13);Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/management-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts
Mariano MB, Graziottin TM, Tefilli MV. Laparoscopic prostatectomy with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2002 Jun;167:2528-9.
Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:513-5.
Leonardo C, Lombardo R, Cindolo L, et al. What is the standard surgical approach to large volume BPE? Systematic review of existing randomized clinical trials. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2020;72:22-9.
Lucca I, Shariat SF, Hofbauer SL, Klatte T. Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2015;33:563-70.
Andraca AZ, Lombardo R, Valencia AC, et al. Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a large single-center prospective cohort study. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73:107-13.
Sotelo R, Spaliviero M, Garcia-Segui A, et al. Laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173:757-60.
Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Renard J, et al. Transcapsular adenomectomy(millin): A comparative study, extraperitoneal laparoscopy versus open surgery. Eur Urol. 2006;49:120-6.
Baumert H, Ballaro A, Dugardin F, Kaisary A. Laparoscopic Versus Open Simple Prostatectomy: A Comparative Study. J Urol. 2006;175:1691-4.
Van Velthoven R, Peltier A, Laguna MP, Piechaud T. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal adenomectomy (Millin): pilot study on feasibility. Eur Urol. 2004;45:103-9.
Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy; a new extravesical technique; report of 20 cases. Lancet. 1945;2:693-6.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-13.
Li J, Cao D, Peng L, et al. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Simple Prostatectomy and Open Simple Prostatectomy for Large Prostates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials. J Endourol. 2019;33:767-76.
McCullough TC, Heldwein FL, Soon SJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: an evaluation of morbidity. J Endourol. 2009;23:129-33.
Lombardo R, Zarraonandia Andraca A, Tema G, et al. How many procedures are needed to achieve learning curve of Millin simple laparoscopic prostatectomy. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74:225-32.
Juaneda R, Thanigasalam R, Rizk J, Perrot E, Theveniaud PE, Baumert H. Análisis comparativo entre la enucleación prostática con láser de holmio y la adenomectomía laparoscópica en el tratamiento de adenomas prostáticos mayores de 100 g. Actas Urol Esp. 2016;40:43–8.
Fuschi A, Al Salhi Y, Velotti G, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of prostate versus minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for large volume (≥ 120 ml) prostate glands: a prospective multicenter randomized study. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73:638-48.
Bertolo R, Dalpiaz O, Bozzini G, et al. Thulium laser enucleation of prostate versus laparoscopic trans-vesical simple prostatectomy in the treatment of large benign prostatic hyperplasia: head-to-head comparison. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48:328-35.
Simone G, Misuraca L, Anceschi U, et al. Urethra and Ejaculation Preserving Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging-guided Madigan Technique. Eur Urol. 2019;75:492-7.
Bove AM, Anceschi U, Ferriero M, et al. Perioperative and 1-year patient-reported outcomes of Freyer versus Millin versus Madigan robot-assisted simple prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2021;39:2005-10.
Anceschi U, Bove AM, Misuraca L, et al. External validation of patient-measured outcomes for robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a comparison of different surgical techniques according to BPH6 index. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73:557-9.
Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano MB, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: A european-American multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;68:86-94.
- Abstract Viewed: 0 times
- Just Accepted-7381 Downloaded: 0 times
Download Statastics
In case of persistent problems in registration, primary uploading of a submission or uploading of a revision, please send us the submission files on the journal email at:
urologyjournal@sbmu.ac.ir
and please attach the screenshot of the error or problem you encountered in uploading.