Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 5 No. 1 (2008): Winter
  4. UNCLASSIFIED

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2008)

Dey 2009

Urinary Polymerase Chain Reaction for Diagnosis of Urogenital Tuberculosis

  • Mohammad Yazdani Yazdani
  • Shahrzad Shahidi Shahidi
  • Majid Shirani Shirani

Urology Journal, Vol. 5 No. 1 (2008), 12 Dey 2009 , Page 46-49
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v5i1.72 Published: 2009-01-12

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic value of urinary polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in urogenital tuberculosis (UTB).

Materials and Methods: In 33 patients with confirmed diagnosis of UTB by urine culture and/or acid-fast staining, clinical symptoms and laboratory and radiological findings were evaluated. For each patient, 3 consecutive urine samples were examined by PCR for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the results were compared with the standard microbiological methods and radiological findings.

Results: The mean interval between the appearance of the symptoms and the diagnosis was 12.3 ± 12.2 months. Symptoms were irritative bladder symptoms such as dysuria and diurnal or nocturnal frequency (51.5%), flank pain (27.3%), microscopic hematuria (18.2%), gross hematuria (9.1%), and suprapubic pain (9.1%). The laboratory findings included hematuria (27.3%), pyuria (12.1%), and hematuria with pyuria (48.5%). Diagnosis of UTB was made in 19 patients by positive urine culture for MT in 19 patients (57.6%), positive acid-fast staining in 6 (18.2%), and both in 8 (24.2%). Intravenous urography showed abnormal findings in 16 patients (61.5%), including pyelocaliceal dilatation (26.9%), ureteral stricture and hydroureter (23.1%), multiple small caliceal deformities (15.4%), severe parenchymal destruction (11.5%), autonephrectomy (11.5%), and calcification (7.7%). Urinary PCR was positive in 16 patients (48.5%) and in 10 (62.5%) with abnormal findings on intravenous urography.

Conclusion: A high index of suspicion is necessary for diagnosis of UTB even in patients with nonspecific manifestations. Urinary PCR is recommended for instant diagnosis and screening before further examinations, but it cannot be the sole diagnostic modality for diagnosis of UTB.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Yazdani, M. Y., Shahidi, S. S., & Shirani, M. S. (2009). Urinary Polymerase Chain Reaction for Diagnosis of Urogenital Tuberculosis. Urology Journal, 5(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v5i1.72
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 327 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 347 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus