Is the Plume of the Surgery on the Covid 19 Patient in the Pandemic Era (world fight) Definitely Safe? What Must to Do?!!!!
Urology Journal,
Vol. 20 No. 04 (2023),
2 October 2023
,
Page 280-280
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v18i.7067
Abstract
Keywords:
- covid 19
- virus
- surgery
How to Cite
Zomorrodi, A. (2023). Is the Plume of the Surgery on the Covid 19 Patient in the Pandemic Era (world fight) Definitely Safe? What Must to Do?!!!!. Urology Journal, 20(04), 280–280. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v18i.7067
References
1- Jonathan Pavlinec and Li-Ming Su ,Surgical Smoke in the Era of the COVID-19 PandemicdIs It Time
to Reconsider Policies on Smoke Evacuation? THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY® https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001142
Vol. 204, 642-644, October 2020
Printed in U.S.A
2- Baki Ekci, Easy-to-use electrocautery smoke evacuation device for open surgery under the risk
of the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of International Medical Research,2020 ,48(8) 1–7
3- Ling Y, Xu SB, Lin YX et al: Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020; 133: 1039
4- Liu Y, Song Y, Hu X et al: Awareness of surgical smoke hazards and enhancement of surgical smoke prevention among the gynecologists. J Cancer 2019; 10: 2788
5. Zhao C, Kim MK, Kim HJ et al: Comparative safety analysis of surgical smoke from transurethral resection of the bladder tumors and transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology 2013; 82: 744.
6. Choi SH, Kwon TG, Chung SK et al: Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 2374
7-30. Pavan N, Crestani A, Abrate A, et al. Risk of virus contamination through surgical smoke during minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review of literature on a neglected issue revived in the COVID-19 pandemic era [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 5]. Eur Urol Focus 2020: S2405-4569: 30156-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.05.021
to Reconsider Policies on Smoke Evacuation? THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY® https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001142
Vol. 204, 642-644, October 2020
Printed in U.S.A
2- Baki Ekci, Easy-to-use electrocautery smoke evacuation device for open surgery under the risk
of the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of International Medical Research,2020 ,48(8) 1–7
3- Ling Y, Xu SB, Lin YX et al: Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020; 133: 1039
4- Liu Y, Song Y, Hu X et al: Awareness of surgical smoke hazards and enhancement of surgical smoke prevention among the gynecologists. J Cancer 2019; 10: 2788
5. Zhao C, Kim MK, Kim HJ et al: Comparative safety analysis of surgical smoke from transurethral resection of the bladder tumors and transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology 2013; 82: 744.
6. Choi SH, Kwon TG, Chung SK et al: Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 2374
7-30. Pavan N, Crestani A, Abrate A, et al. Risk of virus contamination through surgical smoke during minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review of literature on a neglected issue revived in the COVID-19 pandemic era [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 5]. Eur Urol Focus 2020: S2405-4569: 30156-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.05.021
- Abstract Viewed: 292 times
- 7067/pdf Downloaded: 170 times