Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 7 No. 2 (2010): Spring
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2010)

June 2010

Risk of Radiation Exposure During PCNL

  • Heshmatollah Soufi Majidpour

Urology Journal, Vol. 7 No. 2 (2010), 10 June 2010 , Page 87-89
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v7i2.671 Published: 2010-06-10

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: Fluoroscopic guidance is a routine practice in endourology; both the physician and the assistances are exposed to some radiation via radiation scatter. Measurement of radiation doses in staff is important, but often these data are not reported. Materials and Methods: We measured radiation exposure during 100 cases of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the head, eye glasses, the fingers, and the legs of the operating surgeon, the assistant, and the circulating nurse. Results: The mean screening time was 4.5 minutes (range, 1 to 8 minutes) with mean fluoroscopy tube potential of 73 kVp, and mean tube current of 2.8 mA. The estimated scatter exposure rate at 40 cm from the x-ray beam was 0.47, 0.04, 0.21, and 4.1 ?Gy to the head, eye glasses, the fingers, and the legs of the operating surgeon, respectively. The estimated scatter exposure rate at different points from the x-ray beam was 0.05, 0.01, 0.025, and 0.1 ?Gy to the head, eye glasses, the fingers, and the legs of the assistant, respectively and the estimated scatter exposure rate at all different points from the x-ray beam for circulating nurse was 0 ?Gy. Conclusion: Fluoroscopic screening results in radiation exposure of the medical staff. The surgeon received the maximum radiation exposure, mostly to the legs and very least to the eyes. The assistant received less radiation exposure than the surgeon and the nurse did not receive significant amount of radiation.
  • PDF

How to Cite

Soufi Majidpour, H. (2010). Risk of Radiation Exposure During PCNL. Urology Journal, 7(2), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v7i2.671
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 471 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 726 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus