Is 10/12 Fr Ureteral Access Sheath more Suitable for Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy?
Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022),
Purpose: To choose the ideal ureteral access sheath (UAS) size for an unstented ureter in flexible ureteroscopic
Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in patients treated with FURL for renal calculi from 2005 to 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: smaller (10/12 Fr) vs. larger (12/14 Fr) calibre UAS. The outcomes were the insertion success rate, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) complication rate after the operation, ureteral wall injury, operative time, and stone-free rate.
Results: Of the 1573 patients enrolled, 10/12 Fr UAS was used in 957 patients (Group A), and 12/14 Fr UAS was
used in the remaining patients (Group B). The insertion success rate was significantly better in Group A (91.2%
vs. 86.9%, P = .006), with no significant difference between the groups regarding the stone-free rate, postoperative pain, operative time or hospital stay. The severity of visible ureteral lesions with 10/12 Fr UAS was significantly lower than that with larger UASs (80.1% vs 85.2%, P < .001). Despite the lack of a significant difference in the incidence of SIRS between the two groups, the incidence of SIRS in the 10/12 Fr group showed a sharp increase with stones > 2 cm (17.0% vs. 8.5%, P = 0.037).
Conclusion: The use of 10/12 Fr UAS was beneficial with respect to insertion success rate, avoiding ureteral wall
injury and not increasing postoperative infectious complications in FURL. We recommend the use of a smaller
calibre (10/12 Fr) UAS in patients with renal calculi < 2 cm.
- Ureteral access sheath
- Infectious complications
How to Cite
Reis SJM. Ureteroscopy from the recent past to the near future. Urolithiasis. 2018;46:31-37.
Ozgor F, Sahan M, Cubuk A, Ortac M, Ayranci A, Sarilar O. Factors affecting infectious complications following flexible ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:481-486.
Tokas T, Skolarikos A, TRW H, Nagele U. Pressure matters 2: intrarenal pressure ranges during upper-tract endourological procedures. World J Urol. 2019;37:133-142.
Tracy CR, Ghareeb GM, Paul CJ, Brooks NA. Increasing the size of ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery improves surgical efficiency without increasing complications. World J Urol. 2018;36:971-978.
Shvero A, Herzberg H, Zilberman D, et al. Is it safe to use a ureteral access sheath in an unstented ureter. BMC Urol. 2019;19:80.
Traxer O, Wendt-Nordahl G, Sodha H, et al. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol. 2015;33:2137-2144.
Fuller TW, Rycyna KJ, Ayyash OM, et al. Defining the Rate of Primary Ureteroscopic Failure in Unstented Patients: A Multi-Institutional Study. J Endourol. 2016;30:970-974.
Lildal SK, Sørensen FB, Andreassen KH, et al. Histopathological correlations to ureteral lesions visualized during ureteroscopy. World J Urol. 2017;35:1489-1496.
Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189:580-584.
Lima A, Reeves T, Geraghty R, et al. Impact of ureteral access sheath on renal stone treatment: prospective comparative non-randomised outcomes over a 7-year period. World J Urol. 2020;38:1329-1333.
Kuntz NJ, Neisius A, Tsivian M, et al. Balloon Dilation of the Ureter: A Contemporary Review of Outcomes and Complications. J Urol. 2015;194:413-417.
Humphreys MR, Shah OD, Monga M, et al. Dusting versus Basketing during Ureteroscopy-Which Technique is More Efficacious? A Prospective Multicenter Trial from the EDGE Research Consortium. J Urol. 2018;199:1272-1276.
Matlaga BR, Chew B, Eisner B, et al. Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Review of Dusting vs Fragmentation with Extraction. J Endourol. 2018;32:1-6.
Santiago JE, Hollander AB, Soni SD, et al. To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18:32.
Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L, et al. Can We Provide Low Intrarenal Pressures with Good Irrigation Flow by Decreasing the Size of Ureteral Access Sheaths. J Endourol. 2016;30:49-55.
Gao X, Lu C, Xie F, et al. Risk factors for sepsis in patients with struvite stones following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2020;38:219-229.
Fang L, Xie G, Zheng Z, et al. The Effect of Ratio of Endoscope-Sheath Diameter on Intrapelvic Pressure During Flexible Ureteroscopic Lasertripsy. J Endourol. 2019;33:132-139.
Noureldin YA, Kallidonis P, Ntasiotis P, et al. The Effect of Irrigation Power and Ureteral Access Sheath Diameter on the Maximal Intra-Pelvic Pressure During Ureteroscopy: In Vivo Experimental Study in a Live Anesthetized Pig. J Endourol. 2019;33:725-729.
Williams JG, Turney BW, Rauniyar NP, et al. The Fluid Mechanics of Ureteroscope Irrigation. J Endourol. 2019;33:28-34.
Loftus CJ, Ganesan V, Traxer O, et al. Ureteral Wall Injury with Ureteral Access Sheaths: A Randomized Prospective Trial. J Endourol. 2020;34:932-936.
Lildal SK, Andreassen KH, Jung H, et al. Evaluation of ureteral lesions in ureterorenoscopy: impact of access sheath use. Scand J Urol. 2018;52:157-161.
Lildal SK, Nørregaard R, Andreassen KH, et al. Ureteral Access Sheath Influence on the Ureteral Wall Evaluated by Cyclooxygenase-2 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in a Porcine Model. J Endourol. 2017;31:307-313.
Huang J, Zhao Z, AlSmadi JK, et al. Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0193600.
Oğuz U, Şahin T, Şenocak Ç, et al. Factors associated with postoperative pain after retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones. Turk J Urol. 2017;43:303-308.
- Abstract Viewed: 0 times
- 6620/pdf Downloaded: 0 times