Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2022
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022): March-April 2022
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION)

ISSN: 1735-1308

March-April 2022
Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022)

Long-Term Results of Posterolateral Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy and its Comparison with the Conventional Anterior Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy Method in the Management of Urologic Complications in Kidney Transplant Patients

  • Farid Dadkhah
  • Hooshmand Sofimajidpour
  • Majid Aliaskari
  • Amirhesam Airezaei
  • Saeid Taleghani
  • Mohammad Aziz Rasouli
  • Heshmatollah Sofimajidpour

Urology Journal, Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022), , Page 120-125
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v18i.6449 Published 24 January 2022

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: Urological complications are common and serious in kidney transplant patients. Correct diagnosis of urological complications and rapid intervention are very important to maintain the transplanted organ. Using endoscopic methods and rapid access to ureteral orifice can be effective in treatment and management of urological complications in transplant patients.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 934 medical records of kidney transplant patients who underwent surgery through Posterolateral Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy (PLEVUNC) and anterior extravesical ureteroneocystostomy (AEVUNC) techniques from 2011 to 2018 were evaluated. The outcomes of PLEVUNC and AEVUNC techniques were evaluated in 461 and 473 transplant patients, respectively. The patients were followed up for 60 months. Immediate and delayed complications, urological complications requiring endoscopic intervention, duration of access to ureteral orifice, as well as ureteroscopic and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated.
Results: The mean and ± SD (standard deviation) age of patients in PLEVUNC and AEVUNC groups were 46.2 7± 2.7 years and 47.3 ± 3.6 years, respectively. Urinary leakage and UTI were the most common immediate (7% and 6.2%) and delayed (5.5% and 5.5%) complications in both groups, respectively. The time to find ureteral orifice in patients requiring endoscopic intervention was significantly shorter in PLEVUNC group 3.5±1.2 compared with the AEVUNC group 10 ± 4.5 (P <.001). In 100% of PLEVUNC group and 62.6% of AEVUNC group, ureteral orifice of transplanted kidney was observed (P <.001). Ureteroscopy was reported successful in 94.5% and 37.4% of patients in PLEVUNC and AEVUNC groups, respectively.
Conclusion: Easy and safe access to the ureteral orifice and to the upper urinary tract in transplant recipients can be achieved with the PLEVUNC technique. In case of urological complications this method facilitates endoscopy.

Keywords:
  • Kidney Transplantation, Ureteroscopy, urological complications, Urologic Surgical Procedures
  • 6449/pdf

How to Cite

Dadkhah, F., Sofimajidpour, H., Aliaskari, M., Airezaei, A., Taleghani, S., Rasouli, M. A., & Sofimajidpour, H. (2022). Long-Term Results of Posterolateral Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy and its Comparison with the Conventional Anterior Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy Method in the Management of Urologic Complications in Kidney Transplant Patients. Urology Journal, 19(02), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v18i.6449
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Veale JL, Yew J, Gjertson DW, Smith CV, Singer JS, Rosenthal JT, Gritsch HA. Long-term comparative outcomes between 2 common ureteroneocystostomy techniques for renal transplantation. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177:632-6.

Wong G, Howard K, Chapman JR, Chadban S, Cross N, Tong A, Webster AC, Craig JC. Comparative survival and economic benefits of deceased donor kidney transplantation and dialysis in people with varying ages and co-morbidities. PloS one. 2012 Jan 18;7:e29591.

Salehipour M, Salahi H, Jalaeian H, Bahador A, Nikeghbalian S, Barzideh E, Ariafar A, Malek-Hosseini SA. Vascular complications following 1500 consecutive living and cadaveric donor renal transplantations: a single center study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transp. 2009 Jul 1;20:570.

El‐Mekresh M, Osman Y, Ali‐El‐Dein B, El‐Diasty T, Ghoneim MA. Urological complications after living‐donor renal transplantation. BJU international. 2001 Mar;87:295-306.

Slagt IK, Ijzermans JN, Visser LJ, Weimar W, Roodnat JI, Terkivatan T. Independent risk factors for urological complications after deceased donor kidney transplantation. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e91211.

Streem SB. Endourological management of urological complications following renal transplantation. Seminars urol. 1994:12 : 123-133

Shah S, Nath V, Gopalkrishnan G, Pandey AP, Shastri JC. Evaluation of extravesical and Leadbetter‐Politano ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation. Br. J. Urol. 1988 Nov;62:412-3.

Wasnick RJ, Butt KM, Laungani G, Shirani K, Hong JH, Adamsons RJ, Waterhouse K. Evaluation of Anterior Extra Vesical Ureteroneocystostomy in Kidney Transplantation. Urol. J. 1981 Sep;126:306-7.

Hefty TR. Experience with parallel incision extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation. J Urol. 1985 Sep;134:455-6.

Mohammadi Fallah MR, Taghizadeh Afshari A, Asadi M, Sharafi AH. Comparision of barry and barry-taguchi ureterovesical reimplantation techniques in kidney transplantations: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2010;1:77-83..

Krambeck AE, Gettman MT, BaniHani AH, Husmann DA, Kramer SA, Segura JW. Management of nephrolithiasis after Cohen cross-trigonal and Glenn-Anderson advancement ureteroneocystostomy. J Urol. 2007 Jan 1;177:174-79.

Buttigieg J, Agius-Anastasi A, Sharma A, Halawa A. Early urological complications after kidney transplantation: An overview. World J Transplant. 2018 Sep 10;8:142-149.

Dadkhah F, Asgari MA, Tara A, Safarinejad MR. Modified ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation to facilitate endoscopic management of subsequent urological complications. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010; 42:285-93.

Sanei B, Hashemi M, Tabataei A, et al. A Comparison between Two Kidney Transplant Ureteroneocystostomy Techniques: Full-Thickness Single Layer Anastomosis and Lich-Gregoir. J Univer Surg. 2016, 4:56-59.

Balaban M, Ozkaptan O, Cubuk A, Sahan A, Duzenli M, Tuncer M. Endoscopic treatment of symptomatic VUR disease after the renal transplantation: analysis of 49 cases. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020 May;24:483-88.

Krajewski W, Dembowski J, Kołodziej A, Małkiewicz B, Tupikowski K, Matuszewski M, et al. Urological complications after renal transplantation - a single centre experience. Cent European J Urol. 2016;69:306-311.

Ooms LSS, Moelker A, Roodnat JI, Ijzermans JNM, Idu MM, Terkivatan T. Antegrade Balloon Dilatation as a Treatment Option for Posttransplant Ureteral Strictures: Case Series of 50 Patients. Exp Clin Transplant. 2018; 16:150-155.

Frattini A, Capocasale E, Granelli P, Mazzoni MP, Maestroni MP, Dalla Valle R, et al. Endourological management of ureteral stenosis and vesicoureteral reflux after renal transplantation. Urologia. 2007;74:212-6.

Kinnaert P, Hall M, Janssen F, Vereerstraeten P, Toussaint C, Van Geertruyden J. Ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation: true incidence and long-term followup after surgical correction. Urol. J. 1985 Jan; 133:17-20.

He Z, Li X, Chen L, Zeng G, Yuan J, Chen W, Zhang C. Endoscopic incision for obstruction of vesico‐ureteric anastomosis in transplanted kidneys. BJU international. 2008 Jul;102:102-6.

Haberal M, Boyvat F, Akdur A, Kirnap M, Ozcelik U, Karakayali F. Surgical Treatment for Ureteral Obstruction After Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation. 2018; 102:S630.

  • Abstract Viewed: 0 times
  • 6449/pdf Downloaded: 0 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

In case of persistent problems in registration, primary uploading of a submission or uploading of a revision, please send us the submission files on the journal email at:

urologyjournal@sbmu.ac.ir

and please attach the screenshot of the error or problem you encountered in uploading.

 

Make a Submission

          Journal Research in Urology

Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
Keywords
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
The template of this website is designed by Sinaweb