Role of Urodynamics Study in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women
23 February 2021
Objectives: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) usually coexist and are common among women. Since the efficacy of urodynamic studies (UDS) in evaluating these conditions is subject to controversy, this study aimed to assess the accordance between urodynamic findings and LUTS and to determine the importance of UDS in women with POP.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on women over 18 years with symptomatic POP referred to the female urology clinic of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran, during 2017-2018. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study with informed consent. The Pelvic Floor Disability Index (PFDI-20) was completed for each patient. Pelvic examination was performed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POPQ). Subsequently, multi-channel UDS was performed, and the findings were analyzed in SPSS 20, using Chi-square or Fisher’s test.
Results: A total of 200 women with symptomatic POP were included in the study. Stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence showed significant accordance with the urodynamic findings (urodynamic stress incontinence and/or detrusor overactivity). However, there was no significant relationship between urinary voiding LUTS and urodynamic findings.
Conclusion: UDS should be performed for selective patients with POP. According to the results of the present study, UDS can help us provide consultation for POP patients with voiding LUTS. However, in POP patients with urinary incontinence, this test cannot provide further information and should be performed based on the patient’s condition.
- Pelvic organ prolapse, Urodynamic study, Urinary incontinence, Voiding dysfunction
How to Cite
1. Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, et al. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 2005; 112(7):971–6. 3.
2. Cheon C, Maher C. Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24(11):1873–6.
3. .Barber MD. Maher C .Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 7113:70:1263.
4. 4.Jelovsek JE.et al. Pelvic organ prolapse.Lancet 7112; 35::1172
5. Stanton SL, Hilton P, Norton C, Cardozo L. Clinical and urodynamic effects of anterior colporrhaphy and vaginal hysterectomy for prolapse with and without incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89:459.
6. Al-Mandeel H, Ross S, Robert M, Milne J. Incidence of stress urinary incontinence following vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse in objectively continent women. Neurourol Urodyn 2011; 30:390.
7. Katie N. Ballert, MD. Urodynamics in Pelvic Organ Prolapse When Are They Helpful and How Do We Use Them? Urol Clin N Am 41 (2014) 409–417
8. 5. Elser DM, Moen MD, Stanford EJ, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and urinary incontinence: surgical planning based on urodynamics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202(4):375.e1–5. 16.
9. Araki I, Haneda Y, Mikami Y, et al. Incontinence and detrusor dysfunction associated with pelvic organ prolapse: clinical value of preoperative urodynamic evaluation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20(11):1301–6.
10. 3. Roovers JP, Oelke M. Clinical relevance of urodynamic investigation tests prior to surgical correction of genital prolapse: a literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007; 18(4): 455–60
11. 7. Fletcher SG, Haverkorn RM, Yan J, et al. Demographic and urodynamic factors associated with persistent OAB after anterior compartment prolapse repair. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29(8):1414–8.
12. Wolter CE, Kaufman MR, Duffy JW, et al. Mixed incontinence and cystocele: postoperative urge symptoms are not predicted by preoperative urodynamics. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22(3):321–5.
13 .james L,et al.making sense of urodynamic studies for women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse,7117,available at:urologic.theclinics .com.accessed may1707110.
14. Bradley CS, Nygaard IE. Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106(4):759–66.
15. Gajewski JB. Decisions regarding use of urodynamic studies in stress urinary incontinence must be made on a case-by-case basis.Can Assoc J. 7112.
16. Lena D,Ron A,Talma R,et al .Urodynamic finding in women with pelvic organ prolapse and obstructive voiding symptoms.International journal of gynecology and obstetrics.7111;111:11:-71
17. Mouristen L, Larsen JP. Symptoms bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapsed. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7113; 10:177
18. Karamustafaoglu Balci B, et al. 6-year experience in the diagnosis and treatment of occult urinary incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapsed. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 7112
19. Caruso D, Kanagarajah P, Cohen B, et al. What is the predictive value of urodynamics to reproduce clinical findings of urinary frequency, urge urinary incontinence, and/or stress urinary incontinence? Int Urogynecol J. 7111; 71:1716–171.
20. Foster RT Sr, Barber MD, Parasio MF, et al. A prospective assessment of overactive bladder symptoms in a cohort of elderly women who underwent transvaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 7112; 1:2(1): 67.e1–0.
21 .Maurizio S,Stefuno S,Gubriele S,et al.Urinary symptoms and urodynamic findings in women with pelvic organ prolapse:is there a correlation?.Europian urology.7111; 51:763-51
22. Weber AM, Taylor RJ, Wei JT, Lemack G, Piedmonte MR, Walters MD. The cost-effectiveness of reoperative testing (basic office assessment vs. urodynamics) for stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU Int 2002; 89:356–63.
23. Khan MS, Chaliha C, Leskova L, Khullar V. The relationship between urinary symptom questionnaires and urodynamic diagnoses: an analysis of two methods of questionnaire administration. BJOG 2004; 111:468–74.
24. Ward RM, Hampton BS, Blume JD, Sung VW, Rardin CR, Myers DL. The impact of multichannel urodynamics upon treatment recommendations for female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19:1235–41.
- Abstract Viewed: 0 times
- Just Accepted/6408 Downloaded: 0 times