Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 17 No. 6 (2020): November-December2020
  4. UNCLASSIFIED

Vol. 17 No. 6 (2020)

January 2021

Hydatid Cyst Treatment and Management in Retroperitoneal Organs; Is Percutaneous Drainage an Option? Minimally invasive treatment of cyst hydatid

  • Yunus Emre Göger
  • Mehmet Serkan Ozkent
  • Mehmet Aykut Yıldırım
  • Suleyman Bakdık
  • Mehmet Giray Sönmez
  • Cengiz Kadiyoran
  • Mehmet Balasar
  • Murat Cakir

Urology Journal, Vol. 17 No. 6 (2020), 9 January 2021 , Page 657-663
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v17i6.6353 Published: 2020-11-18

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate patients who cyst hydatid (CH) in their retroperitoneal space and organs in order to determine a standard treatment option for CH.

Materials and Methods: The files of 56 patients who were treated for CH in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent either percutaneous drainage (PD) or surgery. Patients were divided into two groups as PD (Group one) and surgery groups (Group two). Preoperative and postoperative results were compared statistically.

Results: 31 of 56 patients were male. Mean age of the patient was 39.7 (10–85). 16 patients had been treated with PD and 40 with different surgical interventions such as total cystectomy, partial cystectomy, partial nephrectomy, total nephrectomy, surrenalectomy, and laparoscopic partial surrenalectomy. Patients’ followed up was 18 months (6-38m). Relapse was seen in 1 patient who underwent PD. On comparing the results, hospitalization period was prolonged in the surgical group with enlarged cyst presence.

Conclusion: CH presence in the retroperitoneal area is rare. PD, a minimally invasive method, has the potential to be the standard treatment option as it can be performed safely in selected patients. However, currently surgical treatment is considered as the first treatment option after CH diagnosis.

Keywords:
  • Cyst hydatid; percutaneous drainage; retroperitoneal-placed cyst hydatid; treatment of hydatid cyst disease; minimally invasive surgery
  • Pdf/6353

How to Cite

Göger, Y. E. ., Ozkent, M. S., Yıldırım, M. A., Bakdık, S., Sönmez, M. G. ., Kadiyoran, C., … Cakir, M. (2020). Hydatid Cyst Treatment and Management in Retroperitoneal Organs; Is Percutaneous Drainage an Option? Minimally invasive treatment of cyst hydatid. Urology Journal, 17(6), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v17i6.6353
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 355 times
  • Pdf/6353 Downloaded: 255 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus