Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 17 No. 05 (2020): September-October2020
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 17 No. 05 (2020)

October 2020

Compare the Clinical Application of Ureteroscopic Occluder and Stone Retrieval Basket During Holmium Laser Treatment for Upper Ureteral Calculi

  • Lin Zhang
  • Yanyuan Wu
  • Ke Xu
  • Haixiao Tang
  • Jie Ding
  • Weimin Wang
  • Ding Xu
  • Zhengqin Gu

Urology Journal, Vol. 17 No. 05 (2020), 30 October 2020 , Page 469-473
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v17i05.5550 Published: 2020-07-21

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic occluder and stone retrieval basket combined with holmium laser in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 103 patients treated with ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones. Patients were divided into two groups based on the device applied during lithotripsy: group 1 for the occluders (52 cases), and group 2 for the stone retrieval baskets (51 cases). The stone upward migration rate, stone-free rate, and complication rate during or after surgery were compared.

Results: The operation time was 45 ± 7 min in the occluder group and 43 ± 5 min in the basket group (P = .111). There was no significant difference between the stone retropulsion rate (13% vs. 16%, P = .787). The successful one-time stone-free rate was 92% vs. 94% (P = .999) respectively. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the hospitalization time (P = .581) and postoperative complication rate (P = .715) between 2 groups.

Conclusion: The treatment of upper ureteral calculi with ureteroscopic occluder and stone retrieval basket combined with holmium laser lithotripsy can both effectively prevent intraoperative stone retropulsion, improve the success rate of one-time lithotrips. The occluder was more cost-effective than the stone retrieval basket, yet it was a more desired choice for over dilated ureters.

Keywords:
  • holmium laser lithotripsy; occluder; stone migration; stone retrieval basket; upper ureteral calculi
  • 5550

How to Cite

Zhang, L., Wu, Y., Xu, K., Tang, H., Ding, J., Wang, W., … Gu, Z. (2020). Compare the Clinical Application of Ureteroscopic Occluder and Stone Retrieval Basket During Holmium Laser Treatment for Upper Ureteral Calculi. Urology Journal, 17(05), 469–473. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v17i05.5550
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 388 times
  • 5550 Downloaded: 233 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus