Effect of Different Musical Types on Patient’s Relaxation, Anxiety and Pain Perception during Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Randomized Controlled Study
Urology Journal,
Vol. 17 No. 1 (2020),
26 January 2020
,
Page 19-23
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v17i1.5333
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of listening to different music types during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) on the patients’ pain control, anxiety level, and satisfaction.
Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective single-blinded, parallel-group randomized clinical trial with balanced randomization [1:1]. A total of 150 patients who underwent first-session SWL were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided in to five groups (30 participants in each group) as follows: headphones were not put on and no music was played in Group 1 (control group); headphones were put on but no music was played in Group 2; Turkish art music was listened to with headphones in Group 3; Western classical music was listened to with headphones in Group 4; thetype of music the patient liked was listened to with headphones in Group 5. Demographic data related to patients and procedure, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Anxiety (STAI-SA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, willingness to repeat procedure (0: never 4: happily), and patient satisfaction rates (0: poor 4: excellent) were recorded immediately after the procedure.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of median VAS scores (7, 6, 4.5, 5, and 4, respectively, P<.001), whereas the VAS scores in Groups 3, 4, and 5 were significantly lower than those in Group 1 and 2 (P<.001). The median STAI-SA scores between the groups were significantly different (45, 45, 42, 45, and 40, respectively, P<.001), while the anxiety levels in Groups 3, 4, and 5 were significantly lower than those in Group 1 (P=.008, P=.018, and P<.001, respectively). Moreover, there were statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of willingness to repeat the procedure and patient satisfaction rates (P<.001).
Conclusions: Music therapy during SWL reduced the patients' pain and anxiety scores, moreover listening to the patient’s preferred music type provided greater satisfaction. Listening to the patient’s preferred music type could be standardized and routinely used during SWL.
How to Cite
References
Bach C, Zaman F, Kachrilas S, Kumar P, Buchholz N, Masood J. Drugs for pain management in shock wave lithotripsy. Pain Res Treat 2011;259426. doi:10.1155/2011/259426
Ngee-Ming G, Tamsin D, Rai BP, Somani BK. Complementary approaches to decreasing discomfort during shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Urolithiasis 2014;42(3):189-193. doi:10.1007/s00240-014-0655-2
Shang AB, Gan TJ. Optimising postoperative pain management in the ambulatory patient. Drugs 2003;63(9):855-867
Heiser RM, Chiles K, Fudge M, Gray SE. The use of music during the immediate postoperative recovery period. AORN J 1997;65(4):777-8, 781-5
Akbas A, Gulpinar MT, Sancak EB, at al. The effect of music therapy during shockwave lithotripsy on patient relaxation, anxiety, and pain perception. Ren Fail 2016;38(1):46-9. doi:10.3109/0886022X.2015.1096728
Karalar M, Keles I, Dogantekin E, Kahveci OK, Sarici H. Reduced Pain and Anxiety with Music and Noise-Canceling Headphones During Shockwave Lithotripsy. J Endourol 2016;30(6):674-7. doi:10.1089/end.2016.0005
Marsdin E, Noble JG, Reynard JM, Turney BW. Audiovisual distraction reduces pain perception during shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 2012;26(5):531-4. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0430
Yilmaz E, Ozcan S, Basar M, Basar H, Batislam E, Ferhat M. Music decreases anxiety and provides sedation in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 2003;61 (2):282-6
White JM. State of the science of music interventions. Critical care and perioperative practice. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2000;12(2):219-225
McCaffrey R, Locsin RC. Music listening as a nursing intervention: a symphony of practice. Holist Nurs Pract 2002;16 (3):70-7
Aydemir Ö, Köroğlu E. Psikiyatride Kullanılan Klinik ölçekler. Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği 2014
Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990;13(4):227-236
Al-Marhoon MS, Shareef O, Al-Habsi IS, Al Balushi AS, Mathew J, Venkiteswaran KP. Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsy Success Rate and Complications: Initial Experience at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. Oman Med J 2013;28(4):255-9. doi:10.5001/omj.2013.72
Eichel L, Batzold P, Erturk E. Operator experience and adequate anesthesia improve treatment outcome with third-generation lithotripters. J Endourol 2001;15(7):671-3. doi:10.1089/08927790152596217
Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A, Thomas K. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. EAU 2017. http://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/ - 3.
Valet M, Sprenger T, Boecker H, at al. Distraction modulates connectivity of the cingulo-frontal cortex and the midbrain during pain an fMRI analysis. Pain 2004;109(3):399-408. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.033
Koch ME, Kain ZN, Ayoub C, Rosenbaum SH. The sedative and analgesic sparing effect of music. Anesthesiology 1998;89(2):300-6
Cepeda MS, Diaz JE, Hernandez V, Daza E, Carr DB. Music does not reduce alfentanil requirement during patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones. J Pain Symptom Manage 1998;16(6):382-7
- Abstract Viewed: 1241 times
- pdf/5333 Downloaded: 732 times