Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 5 No. 2 (2008): Spring
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2008)

November 2008

Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Treatment of Posttransplant Ureteral Obstructions

  • Seyed Abulghasem Mostafa
  • Shahin Abbaszadeh
  • Saeed Taheri
  • Mohammad Hossein Nourbala

Urology Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2 (2008), 25 November 2008 , Page 79-83
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v5i2.50 Published: 2008-12-24

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: We report our experience with percutaneous management of urologic complications following kidney transplantation.

Materials and Methods: Of 1402 consecutive kidney transplant recipients from living donors at our hospital, 21 required percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) for the treatment of obstructive lymphocele (n = 11), urinary calculus (n = 8), and stricture of the ureterovesical junction anastomosis (n = 2). We had also 11 kidney recipients with urine leakage from the ureter who were treated only by indwelling ureteral catheter. Urinary complications were diagnosed based on the clinical symptoms, elevated serum creatinine levels, ultrasonography and renal scintigraphy. Patients with ureteral obstruction or urine leakage were compared with kidney recipients without urologic complications.

Results: A mean decline of 3.1 ± 3.0 mg/dL (range, 0.1 to 10.7 mg/dL) in serum creatinine level was detected (P < .001) after PCN. All of the patients remained symptom free for a mean follow-up period of 34.2 ± 20.1 months (range, 3 to 81 months). Patient and graft survival rates were not different between the patients undergoing PCN and other kidney recipients. The only difference was the history of using antilymphocyte globulin which was significantly more frequent in the patients of the PCN group (P = .01).

Conclusion: In our experience, PCN is a safe and effective method for the treatment of ureteral obstructions in kidney allograft recipients. This method provided long-term success with few recurrences and low morbidity and mortality rates.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Mostafa, S. A., Abbaszadeh, S., Taheri, S., & Nourbala, M. H. (2008). Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Treatment of Posttransplant Ureteral Obstructions. Urology Journal, 5(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v5i2.50
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 304 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 436 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus