Are Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters That Can Determine the Endourological Surgical Technique for Kidney Stones That are Smaller than 2 cm? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019),
17 Khordad 2019
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate whether these parameters could be guiding for us in selection between retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) procedures in kidney stones that are smaller than 2 cm.
Materials and Methods: The patients who had kidney stones smaller than two cm and were planned to undergo surgery were randomly distributed into 2 groups prospectively. RIRS was performed in the RIRS group using a 7.5-F fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscope while mini-PNL group was dilated up to 16.5F and mini-PNL was performed with 12F nephroscopy. Preoperative characteristics, operative and postoperative results were compared in two groups. Thereafter, intra and intergroup comparisons were made to determine the effects of Hounsfield unit (HU) value indicating the stone density being higher or lower than 677 and stone location on stone-free rates.
Results: The study involved 60 patients including 30 in each group. The groups’ preoperative values were similar. The hospitalization time and the total duration of scopy were longer in mini-PNL when the postoperative values were compared (P < .0001). In terms of stone densities, HU values that were lower than 677 in the mini-PNL group affected the stone-free rate and reduced it from 100% (> 677HU) to 55.6% (< 677HU), whereas the change was significant (P = .005). Lower calyx stones affected the RIRS results negatively, whereas multiple calyceal stones affected the mini-PNL group negatively.
Conclusion: Both methods had a similar success rate, but lower pole stones, multiple calyceal stones and stone density parameters affected the stone-free rates significantly, and these may be effective in treatment selection.
How to Cite
Demirbas, A., Resorlu, B., Sunay, M. M. et al.: Which Should be Preferred for Moderate-Size Kidney Stones? Ultramini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? Journal of Endourology, 30: 1285, 2016
Jacquemet, B., Martin, L., Pastori, J. et al.: Comparison of the Efficacy and Morbidity of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Pole Stones Compared with Other Renal Locations. Journal of Endourology, 28: 1183, 2014
Ferakis, N., Stavropoulos, M.: Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and upper ureteral stones: Lessons learned from a review of the literature. Urology Annals, 7: 141, 2015
Cheng, F., Yu, W. M., Zhang, X. B. et al.: Minimally Invasive Tract in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones. Journal of Endourology, 24: 1579, 2010
Karatag, T., Buldu, I., Inan, R. et al.: Is Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy Technique Really Efficacicous for the Treatment of Moderate Size Renal Calculi? Yes. Urologia Internationalis, 95: 9, 2015
Karakan, T., Kilinc, M. F., Doluoglu, O. G. et al.: The modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique and comparison with standard nephrolithotomy: a randomized prospective study. Urolithiasis, 45: 209, 2017
Resorlu, B., Unsal, A.: A New Scoring System for Predicting Stone-free Rate After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: The "Resorlu-Unsal Stone Score" REPLY. Urology, 80: 518, 2012
Resorlu, B., Oguz, U., Resorlu, E. B. et al.: The Impact of Pelvicaliceal Anatomy on the Success of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Patients With Lower Pole Renal Stones. Urology, 79: 61, 2012
Desai, J., Zeng, G. H., Zhao, Z. J. et al.: `A Novel Technique of Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Introduction and an Initial Experience for Treatment of Upper Urinary Calculi Less Than 2 cm. Biomed Research International, 2013
Wilhelm, K., Hein, S., Adams, F. et al.: Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of analgesic consumption and treatment-related patient satisfaction in patients with renal stones 10-35 mm. World Journal of Urology, 33: 2131, 2015
Gucuk, A., Uyeturk, U., Ozturk, U. et al.: Does the Hounsfield Unit Value Determined by Computed Tomography Predict the Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? Journal of Endourology, 26: 792, 2012
Turk, C., Petrik, A., Sarica, K. et al.: EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis. European Urology, 69: 468, 2016
Ozgor, F., Tepeler, A., Elbir, F. et al.: Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of 10-20 mm renal stones in obese patients. World Journal of Urology, 34: 1169, 2016
Kirac, M., Bozkurt, O. F., Tunc, L. et al.: Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis, 41: 241, 2013
Lee, J. W., Park, J., Lee, S. B. et al.: Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger Than 10 mm: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology, 86: 873, 2015
Pelit, E. S., Atis, G., Kati, B. et al.: Comparison of Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Preschool-aged Children. Urology, 101: 21, 2017
Gucuk, A., Kemahli, E., Uyeturk, U. et al.: Routine Flexible Nephroscopy for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones with Low Density: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Journal of Urology, 190: 144, 2013
- Abstract Viewed: 968 times
- PDF/4280 Downloaded: 473 times