Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 6 No. 3 (2009): Summer
  4. UNCLASSIFIED

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2009)

August 2009

Analysis of Suprapubic and Transrectal Measurements in Assessment of Prostate Dimensions and Volume: Is Transrectal Ultrasonography Really Necessary for Prostate Measurements?

  • Eriz Ozden
  • Cagatay Gogus
  • Ozcan Kilic
  • Onder Yaman
  • Erol Ozdiler

Urology Journal, Vol. 6 No. 3 (2009), 27 August 2009 , Page 208-213
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v6i3.399

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation of suprapubic ultrasonography and transrectal ultrasonography in measurements of prostate dimension and volume.

Materials and Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with lower urinary tract symptoms were examined by suprapubic and transrectal ultrasonography modalities in a same session. Measurements of the 3 dimensions of the prostate (anteroposterior, transverse, and craniocaudal) and its volume performed by suprapubic ultrasonography were compared with the corresponding measurements by transrectal ultrasonography in order to determine the correlation of the measurements. Prostate volumes were calculated using the ellipsoid formula. Data were further analyzed in subgroups according to prostate volumes smaller or larger than 50 mL, measured by suprapubic ultrasonography.

Results: The mean prostate volume of the 100 patients, measured by suprapubic and transrectal ultrasonography were 65.9 ± 35.8 mL and 62.5 ± 32.0 mL, respectively (r = 0.94; P < .001). The craniocaudal diameters had the strongest correlation among dimension measurements (r = 0.89; P < .001). Suprapubic and transrectal ultrasonography measurements also showed significant correlations for both prostates smaller or larger than 50 mL. Eighty-five percent of the patients had both volume measurements under or above this limit.

Conclusion: There was strong correlation between suprapubic and transrectal ultrasonography measurements of the prostate sizes, including both for volume or specific dimension measurements.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Ozden, E., Gogus, C., Kilic, O., Yaman, O., & Ozdiler, E. (2009). Analysis of Suprapubic and Transrectal Measurements in Assessment of Prostate Dimensions and Volume: Is Transrectal Ultrasonography Really Necessary for Prostate Measurements?. Urology Journal, 6(3), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v6i3.399
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 350 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 583 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus