Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 6 No. 3 (2009): Summer
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC UROLOGY)

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2009)

August 2009

Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Varicocelectomies in Terms of Operative Time, Sperm Parameters, and Complications

  • Ali Shamsa
  • Leila Mohammadi
  • Mehran Abolbashari
  • Mohammad-Taghi Shakeri
  • Saeed Shamsa

Urology Journal, Vol. 6 No. 3 (2009), 27 August 2009 , Page 170-175
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v6i3.390 Published: 2009-08-20

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: Varicocele is one of the most common causes of infertility. In this study, we evaluated and compared the operative time, sperm analysis results, and complications of three different methods of open and laparoscopic varicocelectomies.

Materials and Methods: From among all bilateral varicocelectomies in our center, we randomly selected 30 of each following cases: laparoscopic varicocelectomy, open subinguinal varicocelectomy under general anesthesia, and open subinguinal varicocelectomy under local anesthesia. We compared the operative time, sperm analysis results, and complications between these three groups.

Results: The mean operative times were 30.0 ± 5.5 minutes for laparoscopies, 27.0 ± 3.5 minutes for open varicocelectomies under general anesthesia, and 38.0 ± 1.8 minutes for open varicocelectomies under local anesthesia (P = .02). Intra-operative complications occurred only in the laparoscopic group, and postoperative complications were seen in 23.3%, 20.0%, and 4.2% of the patients with laparoscopy, open surgery under general anesthesia, and open surgery under local anesthesia, respectively. Semen analysis did not show any significant changes after varicocelectomy except for a slight improvement of sperm morphology in patients who underwent open varicocelectomy under local anesthesia.

Conclusion: Subinguinal varicocelectomy under local anesthesia is better than laparoscopic method in terms of recurrence, hydrocele formation, and operative time. Subinguinal method under general anesthesia has intermediate efficacy regarding less complications than laparoscopic method and shorter operative time than the two other methods.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Shamsa, A., Mohammadi, L., Abolbashari, M., Shakeri, M.-T., & Shamsa, S. (2009). Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Varicocelectomies in Terms of Operative Time, Sperm Parameters, and Complications. Urology Journal, 6(3), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v6i3.390
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 369 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 441 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus