Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 13 No. 6 (2016): November-December2016
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 13 No. 6 (2016)

December 2016

The Association of Stone Opacity in Plain Radiography with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes and Complications

  • Robab Maghsoudi
  • Masoud Etemadian
  • Amir Hossein Kashi
  • Alireza Ranjbaran

Urology Journal, Vol. 13 No. 6 (2016), 8 December 2016 , Page 2899-2902
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v13i6.3669 Published: 2016-12-08

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the influence of stone opacity in plain radiography on stone free rate and complications ofpercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Materials and Methods: A number of 101 patients who underwent PCNL between July-September 2015 wereprospectively included. Stone opacity was judged on preoperative plain Kidney-Ureter-Bladder X-ray. Stone freerate was evaluated two weeks after the operation by ultrasonography and KUB.

Results: There were 61 patients with opaque stones and 40 patients with non-opaque stones. The age, body massindex, preoperative creatinine, history of stone surgery, and stone size was not statistically different betweenpatients with opaque and non-opaque stones. Neither operation duration nor access numbers were statisticallysignificant between opaque and non-opaque stones. The frequency of stone free patients in opaque stones and nonopaquestones were 55/61 (90%) and 30/40 (75%) respectively (P = .04) The magnitude of hemoglobin drop inopaque stones and non-opaque stones were 1.9 ± 1.2 mg/dL versus 2.9 ± 1.7 mg/dL (P = .005).

Conclusion: The stone free rate is lower and the magnitude of bleeding is higher in PCNL of non-opaque stoneswhen compared to opaque stones if rigid instruments are used for nephroscopy.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Maghsoudi, R., Etemadian, M., Kashi, A. H., & Ranjbaran, A. (2016). The Association of Stone Opacity in Plain Radiography with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes and Complications. Urology Journal, 13(6), 2899–2902. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v13i6.3669
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 595 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 388 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus