Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2022
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 14 No. 2 (2017): March-April2017
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

ISSN: 1735-1308

March-April2017
Vol. 14 No. 2 (2017)

Comparison of Success Rate in Complete Supine Versus Semi Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: (The first pilot study in randomized clinical trial)

  • Siavash Falahatkar
  • Ali Ghasemi
  • Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam
  • Samaneh Esmaeili
  • Ehsan Kazemnezhad
  • Seyed Naser Seyed Esmaeili
  • Reza Motiee

Urology Journal, Vol. 14 No. 2 (2017), , Page 3000-3007
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v14i2.3626 Published 16 March 2017

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To compare outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the complete supine versus semi supine position in order to select the best position.
Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial, between July 2011 and May 2014, a total of 44 patients who presented for PCNL were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups [complete supine (n=22), and
semi supine (n = 22)]. The results in both positions were compared regarding the complexity and outcomes. Stone
free rate was considered as a main target of the study. However, it was the first study to focus on overlapping the vertebral density during the access.
Results: The two groups were comparable in age, gender, body mass index, and preoperative glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin and creatinine. The mean operative time was significantly shorter for complete supine versus semi supine (36.68 ± 14.12 min versus 47.50 ± 16.45 min, P = .024). At the angle of 0?, overlapping with the spine occurred in 7 patients (31.8%) in semi supine group and just in 1 patient (4.5%) in complete supine group. Also, overlapping with the edge of bed occurred in 10 cases (45.5%) of complete supine and 1 (4.5%) of semi supine; the differences were statistically significant (P = .023, P = .002, respectively). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of stone free rate and complications.
Conclusion: Although, we had to convert two cases from semi supine into the complete supine position but we have demonstrated that PCNL in both positions is safe, effective and suitable for the patients. The stone free rate was similar in both groups. But the complete supine position is associated with a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay and operative time, which may improve ease and safety of PCNL for patients.
  • PDF

How to Cite

Falahatkar, S., Ghasemi, A., Gholamjani Moghaddam, K., Esmaeili, S., Kazemnezhad, E., Seyed Esmaeili, S. N., & Motiee, R. (2017). Comparison of Success Rate in Complete Supine Versus Semi Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: (The first pilot study in randomized clinical trial). Urology Journal, 14(2), 3000-3007. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v14i2.3626
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 517 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 354 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

In case of persistent problems in registration, primary uploading of a submission or uploading of a revision, please send us the submission files on the journal email at:

urologyjournal@sbmu.ac.ir

and please attach the screenshot of the error or problem you encountered in uploading.

 

Make a Submission

          Journal Research in Urology

Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
Keywords
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
The template of this website is designed by Sinaweb