Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 13 No. 4 (2016): July-August 2016
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (FEMALE UROLOGY)

Vol. 13 No. 4 (2016)

August 2016

Is There a Role for Urodynamic Study in Women with Urinary Incontinence?

  • Elnaz Ayati
  • Zinat Ghanbari
  • Mohsen Ayati
  • Erfan Amini
  • Maryam Deldar Pesikhani

Urology Journal, Vol. 13 No. 4 (2016), 31 August 2016 , Page 2784-2787
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v13i4.3537 Published: 2016-08-25

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To compare clinical and urodynamic study (UDS) findings in Iranian women with mixed or stress UI (Urinary Incontinence).

Materials and methods: A total of 132 patients with either stress or mixed type of UI were enrolled. After accurate examination, data regarding age, parity, mode of delivery and menopausal state were recorded. Furthermore the presence and severity of UI was evaluated with empty bladder supine stress test (ESST) and cough test in supine and standing positions in all patients. Eligible cases underwent UDS evaluation by an expert urologist using a standardized protocol.

Results: Stress and mixed UI were found in 33 (25%) and 99 (75%) patients respectively. By considering clinical evaluation as gold standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of urodynamic study were 83.4%, 30.4%, 43.4% and 80% for detecting stress UI and 96.1%, 35.6%, 34.7%, 96.2% for detecting mixed UI respectively. No correlation was noted between ESST or cough test results and Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) values in patients with stress UI, however ESST was correlated with VLPP values in patients with mixed UI.

Conclusion: Despite a relatively high sensitivity, the specificity was low and urodynamic evaluation seems to be of limited value in the assessment of UI in female patients.

 

  • PDF

How to Cite

Ayati, E., Ghanbari, Z., Ayati, M., Amini, E., & Deldar Pesikhani, M. (2016). Is There a Role for Urodynamic Study in Women with Urinary Incontinence?. Urology Journal, 13(4), 2784–2787. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v13i4.3537
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 683 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 476 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus