Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 1 No. 1 (2004): Winter
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2004)

June 2009

The Application of KUB for Detecting of Submucosal Ureteral Stones

  • Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
  • Mohammad Ghasem Mohseni
  • Arash Ardastani

Urology Journal, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2004), 18 June 2009 , Page 32-34
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v1i1.352 Published: 2009-06-18

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: The accurate diagnosis of submucosal ureteral stones in order to choose a proper and less complicative method of treatment is of significant importance. The use of KUB to detect submucosal ureteral stones has been studied in this research.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study has been carried out on 33 patients (23 males and 10 females) with lower ureteral stone (17 cases in the right ureter and 16 in the left) located under iscial spine as was indicated in their KUB. The distance from the lower end of stone to the midline of sacrum was measured per millimeter using KUB. All patients underwent ureteroscopy, and accordingly those with submucosal ureteral stones were distinguished. The correlation between the distance of the lower end of stone from the middle line of sacrum and the existence of submucosal ureteral stone was analyzed.

Results: Nineteen out of 33 studied patients had submucosal ureteral stones. The average distance between the peak of stone and the middle line of sacrum in patients with submucosal ureteral stone was 9.7 mm with an accuracy of 1.4 mm, a confidence interval 95% and standard deviation of 3.1 mm. Accordingly, if the distance of stone from the middle line of sacrum is lower than 13.7 mm, in 90% of cases the stone will be submucosal.

Conclusion: In patients with lower ureteral stone, the KUB of whom indicates a stone under iscial spine, if the distance of the peak of stone from the midline of sacrum was lower than 15 mm, the stone could most likely be submucousal, a point, which should be considered during treatment. In such cases the intravesical approach should be considered intraoperatively and preparation for submucosal ureteral incision must be provided. This method would be useful in stone removal, if the classic ureteroscopy was not successful.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Aghamir, S. M. K., Mohseni, M. G., & Ardastani, A. (2009). The Application of KUB for Detecting of Submucosal Ureteral Stones. Urology Journal, 1(1), 32–34. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v1i1.352
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 296 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 186 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus