Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 1 No. 1 (2004): Winter
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2004)

June 2009

The Role of Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Renal Transplantation Complications

  • Abbas Basiri
  • Nasser Simforoosh
  • Mohammad Reza Nikoobakht
  • Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini Moghadam

Urology Journal, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2004), 18 June 2009 , Page 27-31
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v1i1.351 Published: 2009-06-18

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of diagnostic and therapeutic ureteroscopy in renal allograft ureters.

Materials and methods: We reviewed 1560 consecutive renal allografts have been preformed between June 1989 and February 2002.Twenty-eight patients (1.8%) had indication for endoscopic procedure on allograft ureter. Six patients had obstructive ureteral calculi with a history of failed ESWL, 3 had suspected ureteral stricture, 9 had upward migrated ureteral stents and 10 had ureteral stricture at ureteroneocystostomy site. Ureters were anastomosed to bladder using Leadbetter- Politano and Lich-GreGoire methods in 6 and 22 cases, respectively. Ureteroscopies were performed with semi rigid 9.8F wolf ureteroscope.

Results: Identifying and introducing the ureteral orifice was successful in 19 (68%) cases. If we exclude 10 patients with ureteral stricture, ureteroscopy was successful in 13 out of 18 (72%). Four ureteral calculi (67%) were removed with ureteroscope.Seven out of nine migrated stents (78%) were retrieved. Four patients with ureteral stricture at ureteroneocystostomy site (40%) had successful ureteral dilatation and double J ureteral catheters were also inserted. Diagnostic ureteroscopy was successful in all cases. Two complications including one urinary leakage and one symptomatic urinary tract infection occurred that were managed conservatively.

Conclusion: Ureteral endoscopy was safe and effective method for management of urological complications after RT (renal transplantation). This procedure can be considered as the first choice compared with percutaneous and antegrade modalities.
  • PDF

How to Cite

Basiri, A., Simforoosh, N., Nikoobakht, M. R., & Hosseini Moghadam, M. M. (2009). The Role of Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Renal Transplantation Complications. Urology Journal, 1(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v1i1.351
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 292 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 263 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus