Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 13 No. 1 (2016): January-February 2016
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2016)

March 2016

Treatment of Moderate Sized Renal Pelvis Calculi: Stone Clearance Time Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

  • Hakan Ercil
  • Ergun Alma
  • Okan Bas
  • Nevzat Can Sener
  • Ediz Vuruskan
  • Faruk Kuyucu
  • Umut Unal
  • Mehmet Resit Gören
  • Yalcin Evliyaoglu

Urology Journal, Vol. 13 No. 1 (2016), 6 March 2016 , Page 2490-2495
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v13i1.3203 Published: 2016-03-05

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the stone clearance times in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for single radiopaque renal pelvis stones 10-20 mm in size. The results of this study may guide urologists and patients and aid in selecting the optimal preoperative treatment.

Materials and Methods: Between January 2013 and February 2015, we conducted a retrospective study and collected data from 333 patients treated with SWL (n = 172) or RIRS (n = 161). We included successfully treated patients with a single radiopaque renal pelvis stone 10-20 mm in size to calculate stone clearance times.

Results: The average stone size for the SWL group was 14.62 ± 2.58 mm and 14.91 ± 2.92 mm for the RIRS group. The mean Hounsfield unit (HU) of the patients was 585.40 ± 158.39 HU in the SWL group and 567.74 ± 186.85 HU in the RIRS group. Following full fragmentation, the mean stone clearance time was 26.55 ± 9.71 days in the SWL group and 11.59 ± 7.01 days in the RIRS group (P < .001).

Conclusion: One of the most overlooked parameters in urinary stone treatments is stone clearance. We believe this study will shed light for those who aim to conduct larger randomized prospective studies.

 

  • PDF

How to Cite

Ercil, H., Alma, E., Bas, O., Sener, N. C., Vuruskan, E., Kuyucu, F., … Evliyaoglu, Y. (2016). Treatment of Moderate Sized Renal Pelvis Calculi: Stone Clearance Time Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Urology Journal, 13(1), 2490–2495. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v13i1.3203
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 714 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 472 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus