Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 12 No. 6 (2015): November-December 2015
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER(UROLOGICAL ONCOLOGY)

Vol. 12 No. 6 (2015)

December 2015

Comparison of Non-Hilar Clamping Simple Enucleation and Enucleo-Re¬section of Exophytic Renal Tumors

  • Mehmet Balasar
  • Emrullah Durmus
  • Mehmet Mesut Piskin
  • Giray Karalezli
  • Recai Gurbuz
  • Mehmet Kilinc

Urology Journal, Vol. 12 No. 6 (2015), 23 December 2015 , Page 2410-2416
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v12i6.2960 Published: 2015-12-23

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

urpose: To retrospectively evaluate our institutional experience with non-hilar-clamping simple enucleation (SE) and enucleoresection (ER) for the treatment of exophytic renal tumors regarding their oncological outcomes.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients treated between 2006 and 2013 for clinical exophytic T1-T2a renal tumors using open nephron-sparing surgery.

Results: A total of 33 patients underwent SE and 39 underwent ER. The mean tumor size was 38.7 mm. None of the patients had positive surgical margins. No local recurrences were observed during the postoperative follow-up period (mean 40.7 ± 23.4 months); however, ipsilateral adrenal and contralateral kidney metastasis was detected in one of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the R.E.N.A.L Nephrometry Score, operative time, or intraoperative blood loss in the non-hilar-clamping SE and ER groups (P > .05). During the third postoperative month, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels in the SE group were significantly reduced compared with the preoperative eGFR levels (P = .046).

Conclusion: SE and ER with non-hilar clamping are safe, acceptable approaches for treating exophytic renal tumors.

 

  • PDF

How to Cite

Balasar, M., Durmus, E., Piskin, M. M., Karalezli, G., Gurbuz, R., & Kilinc, M. (2015). Comparison of Non-Hilar Clamping Simple Enucleation and Enucleo-Re¬section of Exophytic Renal Tumors. Urology Journal, 12(6), 2410–2416. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v12i6.2960
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 474 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 352 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus