Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 11 No. 05 (2014): September-October 2014
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC UROLOGY)

Vol. 11 No. 05 (2014)

November 2014

Comparison of Standard Absorbable Sutures with Self-Retaining Sutures in Retroperitoneoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Retrospective Study of 68 Patients

  • Weifeng Xu
  • Hanzhong Li
  • Yushi Zhang
  • Xuebin Zhang
  • Zhigang Ji

Urology Journal, Vol. 11 No. 05 (2014), 1 November 2014 , Page 1878-1883
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v11i05.2546 Published: 2014-11-01

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: Although laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has been increasingly adopted in the treatment of small localized renal tumor, technical changes remain nowadays. The current study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel QUILLTM Self-Retaining System (SRS) for renorrhaphy during LPN. Materials and Methods: Sixty-eight patients with kidney neoplasm that accepted LPN at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from July 2010 to March 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-five patients who received renal sutures with QUILLTM SRS constituted group 1. The control group (group 2) was composed of 33 patients who received standard absorbable Vicryl sutures by the same surgeon. Renorrhaphy was performed in both groups using two layers, with a closure of the deep vessels and collecting system, followed by a running closure of the renal capsule. The demographic and perioperative parameters (gender, laterality of the tumor, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, standardized nephrometry scoring system (R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score), estimated blood loss and warm ischemic time (WIT)) were compared between the groups. Risk factors of WIT and blood loss were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results: Renorrhaphy was successfully completed in both groups. The baseline data of two groups did not differ significantly. Logistic regression analysis showed WIT decreased when the QUILLTM SRS was used (21.8 ± 3.5 min vs. 25.6 ± 4.0 min; ? = -4.109, P < .001). Suture methods were an independent predictor of WIT rather than blood loss (115.7 ± 57.9 mL vs. 137.9 ± 68.5 mL; P = .329). Conclusion: QUILLTM SRS can be effectively and safely used for renorrhaphy during LPN with the potential advantage of shortening WIT.
  • PDF

How to Cite

Xu, W., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., & Ji, Z. (2014). Comparison of Standard Absorbable Sutures with Self-Retaining Sutures in Retroperitoneoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Retrospective Study of 68 Patients. Urology Journal, 11(05), 1878–1883. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v11i05.2546
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 450 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 408 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus