Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2025
    • Instant 2024
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2022
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 11 No. 05 (2014): September-October 2014
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 11 No. 05 (2014)

November 2014

Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Semirigid Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 124 Patients

  • Mert Ali Karadag
  • Aslan Demir
  • Kursat Cecen
  • Murat Bagcioglu
  • Ramazan Kocaaslan
  • Fatih Altunrende

Urology Journal, Vol. 11 No. 05 (2014), 1 November 2014 , Page 1867-1872
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v11i05.2513 Published: 2014-11-01

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate and compare the stone clearence and complication rates of flexible ureteroscopy (URS) with semirigid URS in patients having proximal ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: The data of 124 patients with proximal ureteral stones who underwent semirigid or flexible ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy between March 2008 and December 2012 were retrospectively investigated. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the operation types. Group 1 included 63 patients who were treated with semirigid URS and group 2 was consisted from 61 patients who underwent flexible URS. Each group was compared in terms of stone diameter, successful access to the stone, operation time, reoperation rates, stone free status at postoperative 1st and 3rd month and complications. Results: Successful access was achieved in 48/63 (76%) of the cases in group 1 and 57/61 (93%) of the patients in group 2 (P < .05). Initial stone free status was 63.4% (40/63) and 86.8% (53/61) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < .05). Third month radiologic investigations revelaed a stone free rate of 77.7% (49/57) in group 1 and 93.4% (57/61) in group 2 (P < .05). Reoperation was required in 20.6% (13/63) of cases in group 1 and this value was only 6% (4/61) in group 2 (P < .05). There was not any statistically significant difference between 2 groups in terms of complication rates (P > .05). Conclusion: Flexible URS is a favorable option for patients having proximal ureteral stones with higher stone free rate; on the other hand semirigid URS seems a less successful alternative for treatment of proximal ureteral stones.
  • PDF

How to Cite

Karadag, M. A., Demir, A., Cecen, K., Bagcioglu, M., Kocaaslan, R., & Altunrende, F. (2014). Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Semirigid Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 124 Patients. Urology Journal, 11(05), 1867–1872. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v11i05.2513
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 728 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 551 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus