Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 2 No. 3 (2005): Summer
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2005)

April 2009

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with and without Retrograde Pyelography: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Ali Tabibi
  • Hamed Akhavizadegan
  • Kia Noori Mahdavi
  • Mohammad Najafi Semnani
  • Mojgan Karbakhsh Davari
  • Ali Reza Niroomand

Urology Journal, Vol. 2 No. 3 (2005), 28 April 2009 , Page 132-136
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v2i3.235 Published: 2009-04-28

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: Since the introduction of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), many modifications to entering the pyelocalyceal system have been made. One alternative is to insert a needle pointed to an opaque stone as a landmark. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of managing kidney calculi by PNL with and without retrograde pyelography.

Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 55 candidates for PNL with a single opaque kidney calculus in the calyx alone, the pelvis alone, or both the calyx and the pelvis were assigned into 2 groups. Twenty-seven patients underwent PNL with a ureteral catheter, and 28 patients underwent PNL without a ureteral catheter. Clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using plain radiographs taken on the first day after the procedure.

Results: Patients had similar distributions regarding sex, age, operative time, hospital stay, past surgical history on the kidneys, and stone size. There was a significantly greater decrease in postoperative hemoglobin level in patients having PNL with a ureteral catheter (P < .001) than in those having the procedure without a ureteral catheter. No differences were seen among patients in the 2 groups in terms of stone-free rate, and number of patients with insignificant residue, and those needing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, a second PNL procedure, or transurethral lithotripsy.

Conclusions: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ureteral catheterization has specific benefits: urine leakage is lower and there is no need to perform cystoscopy. Patients with a single kidney calculus are good candidates for PNL without previous ureteral catheter insertion.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Tabibi, A., Akhavizadegan, H., Noori Mahdavi, K., Najafi Semnani, M., Karbakhsh Davari, M., & Niroomand, A. R. (2009). Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with and without Retrograde Pyelography: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology Journal, 2(3), 132–136. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v2i3.235
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 463 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 277 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus