Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 2 No. 4 (2005): Autumn
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY)

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2005)

April 2009

Buccal Mucosal Graft in Repeat Urethroplasty

  • Abdorasol Mehrsai
  • Hooman Djaladat
  • Alireza Sina
  • Sepehr Salem
  • Gholamreza Pourmand

Urology Journal, Vol. 2 No. 4 (2005), 26 April 2009 , Page 206-210
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v2i4.226 Published: 2009-04-26

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

 Introduction: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of a tubed buccal mucosal graft in repeat urethroplasty for patients with urethral stricture and failed previous operations.

Materials and Methods: Ten patients (aged 12 to 47 years) with urethral stricture were entered into the study. All had a history of failed previous urethroplasties, and 5 had failed internal urethrotomies too. Repeat urethroplasties were performed by excising the fibrous tissue around the stricture; buccal mucosa was then harvested from the inner cheek, made into graft tubing, and interposed into the defect. The patients were followed at 1, 6, and 12 months.

Results: The procedure was technically successful in all the patients. The mean operative time was 150 minutes. The stricture sites were in the posterior urethra in 8 and the anterior urethra in 2 patients. The mean urethral defect length was 4.9 cm. The primary etiology was pelvic fracture in 7 patients. Strictures recurred postoperatively in 3 patients, all of whom had a urethral defect longer than 5 cm, and 2 of whom had more than 1 previous failed urethroplasties (compared with 1 out of 7 in the successful cases). Urinary flow rate increased significantly (from 0 to 10.4 ± 7.33 mL/s) postoperatively (P = .018). Longer strictures produced signifcantly poorer graft urethroplasty outcomes (P = .001).

Conclusion: Urethroplasty with buccal mucosal grafts is tough, resilient, easy to harvest, and it leaves no scar. It appears to be an optimal substitute for anterior and posterior urethral strictures longer than 3 cm.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Mehrsai, A., Djaladat, H., Sina, A., Salem, S., & Pourmand, G. (2009). Buccal Mucosal Graft in Repeat Urethroplasty. Urology Journal, 2(4), 206–210. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v2i4.226
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 290 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 206 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus