Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 11 No. 4 (2014): July-August 2014
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER(UROLOGICAL ONCOLOGY)

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2014)

September 2014

Periprostatic Adiposity Measured on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates with Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness

  • Zhang Qiang
  • Sun Li-jiang
  • Qi Jun
  • Yang Zhi-gang
  • Huang Tao
  • Huo Ri-cha

Urology Journal, Vol. 11 No. 4 (2014), 6 September 2014 , Page 1793-1799
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v11i4.2193 Published: 2014-09-06

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) and obesity measur­ing the periprostatic fat on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and Methods: One hundred eighty-four patients who had undergone radical retropubic prosta­tectomy (RRP) were analyzed retrospectively. The different fat measurements (periprostatic fat area (PFA), the subcutaneous fat thickness, the anterior and posterior abdominal fat thicknesses and anteroposterior diameter) were performed on the slices of MRI and then compared with the clinical and pathologic char­acteristics.

Results: The PFA and ratio showed a statistically significant differences (P = .019 and P = .025, respec­tively) among three groups, that is to say, more adipose were distributed in periprostatic area of the high risk patients. Seventy-one patients in clinical stage and 82 patients in Gleason score have the significant dif­ferences between pre-operation and post-operation values. In the clinical stage, the PFA and ratio showed a statistically significant differences (P = .014 and P = .037, respectively). The difference group had more periprostatic adipose than the other one (65.26 ± 9.03 vs. 64.44 ± 9.62; 87.52 ± 3.97 vs. 87.30 ± 3.96). Noth­ing but the "PFA" was significantly different between two groups (P = .017). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age revealed a statistically significant association between the PFA, the Ratio and the risk of having high-risk disease (P = .031 and P = .024, respectively).

Conclusion: The periprostatic adiposity not only affects the PCa aggressiveness, but also has effect in accurate assessment of the tumor stage and grade. We should predict the prognosis of patient with RRP by measuring periprostatic adiposity on pre-operative MR

 

  • PDF

How to Cite

Qiang, Z., Li-jiang, S., Jun, Q., Zhi-gang, Y., Tao, H., & Ri-cha, H. (2014). Periprostatic Adiposity Measured on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates with Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness. Urology Journal, 11(4), 1793–1799. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v11i4.2193
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 1631 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 387 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus