Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 3 No. 3 (2006): Summer
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2006)

Esfand 2009

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Prone and Supine Positions for Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi

  • Afshar Zomorrodi
  • Amirreza Elahian
  • Nematollah Ghorbani
  • Anahita Tavoosi

Urology Journal, Vol. 3 No. 3 (2006), 21 Esfand 2009 , Page 130-133
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v3i3.183 Published: 2009-02-21

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment of upper ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in the supine and prone positions.

Materials and Methods: A total of 68 patients with upper ureteral calculi underwent SWL. In 35 patients, the procedure was performed in the supine position (group 1), while in the 33 remainders, it was performed in the prone position (group 2). The stone-free rate, the number of SWL sessions required, and the number of shocks per treatment session were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: The mean calculus size was 12.4 ± 3.1 mm and 12.2 ± 2.9 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The stone-free rate was 81.8% in group 1 and 82.9% in group 2 (P = .91). The number of sessions for achieving the stone-free status was similar in the patients of the 2 groups (1.9 ± 0.8 in group 1 versus 1.9 ± 0.8 in group 2; P = .79). The mean number of shock waves per treatment session was not significantly different between the 2 groups. No major complications were seen and none of the patients required hospitalization, placement of a ureteral catheter, or a double-J stent.

Conclusion: Our study showed that in the prone position, treatment of the upper ureteral calculi by SWL is as safe and effective as the supine position.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Zomorrodi, A., Elahian, A., Ghorbani, N., & Tavoosi, A. (2009). Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Prone and Supine Positions for Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi. Urology Journal, 3(3), 130–133. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v3i3.183
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 332 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 279 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus