Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 4 No. 1 (2007): Winter
  4. UNCLASSIFIED

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2007)

February 2009

Diuresis Renography for Differentiation of Upper Urinary Tract Dilatation From Obstruction: F+20 and F-15 Methods

  • Rahim Taghavi
  • Kamran Ariana
  • Davoud Arab

Urology Journal, Vol. 4 No. 1 (2007), 15 February 2009 , Page 36-40
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v4i1.153 Published: 2009-02-15

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate diuresis renography with an intravenous injection of furosemide 20 minutes after administering the radiopharmaceutical (F+20 protocol) or 15 minutes before (F-15 protocol) in patients with upper urinary tract dilatation.

Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients with pyelocaliceal system dilatation, but not ureteral dilatation, on ultrasonography were evaluated. The patients underwent diuresis renography using the F+20 and F-15 protocols. Renal scan findings and kidney split function were recorded. Then, the patients underwent surgical or conservative treatment according to their clinical conditions and imaging results. Follow-up was done 3 and 6 months postoperatively by physical examination, intravenous urography, and diuresis renography.

Results: Eleven patients (52.4%) had complete obstruction in both protocols of renography, and 5 (23.8%) had an equivocal result in the F+20 and an obstructive pattern in the F-15. These patients underwent surgical operation. In 3 patients (14.3%), both protocols demonstrated a normal urinary tract. In 2 patients (9.5%), a nonobstructive response in the F+20 and an equivocal result in the F-15 were seen. One of them underwent surgical operation because of impaired kidney function during the follow-up and 1 was treated conservatively. Overall, obstruction was found in 16 out of 21 patients (76.2%) by the F-15 protocol, while it was found in 11 (52.4%) by the F+20 protocol (P = .01). The mean kidney split function was 55.15% ± 7.82% and 54.81% ± 6.87% in F+20 and F-15 protocols, respectively (P = .45).

Conclusion: Using the F-15 protocol may reduce the equivocal results of the F+20 for diuresis renography.
  • PDF

How to Cite

Taghavi, R., Ariana, K., & Arab, D. (2009). Diuresis Renography for Differentiation of Upper Urinary Tract Dilatation From Obstruction: F+20 and F-15 Methods. Urology Journal, 4(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v4i1.153
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 378 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 479 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus