Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 4 No. 2 (2007): Spring
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2007)

Bahman 2009

Blind Puncture in Comparison With Fluoroscopic Guidance in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Abbas Basiri
  • Sadrollah Mehrabi
  • Hamidreza Kianian
  • Ahmad Javaherforooshzadeh
  • Mohammad Reza Kamranmanesh

Urology Journal, Vol. 4 No. 2 (2007), 14 Bahman 2009 , Page 79-85
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v4i2.135 Published: 2009-02-14

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: Our aim was to evaluate blind puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for decreasing the risk of radiation.

Materials and Methods: One hundred candidates for PCNL were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Blind access was performed for the patients in group 1 and the standard access using fluoroscopy for those in group 2. In group 1, displacement of the targeted calyx in the prone position was estimated by fluoroscopy comparing to the image on intravenous urography. Puncture of the calyx was attempted 3 cm to 4 cm below the marked site of the targeted calyx with a 30° angle. If the access to the collecting system was felt and urine came out, the site of puncture would be controlled by fluoroscopy. If the access failed, we would repeat puncturing up to 5 times.

Results: The mean time to access was 6.6 ± 2.1 minutes and 5.5 ± 1.7 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .008). The mean time of radiation exposure was 0.95 ± 0.44 minutes in group 2. A successful puncture to the targeted calyx was achieved in 50% and 90% of the patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < .001) and a successful calculus removal in 62% and 100% of the patients in groups 1 and 2 (P < .001).

Conclusion: Although about half of the patients benefited from blind access in our study, this technique can not be solely relied on, and fluoroscopy or ultrasonography should be available for prevention of complications.

 

  • PDF

How to Cite

Basiri, A., Mehrabi, S., Kianian, H., Javaherforooshzadeh, A., & Kamranmanesh, M. R. (2009). Blind Puncture in Comparison With Fluoroscopic Guidance in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology Journal, 4(2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v4i2.135
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 424 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 331 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus