Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 8 No. 3 (2011): Summer
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ANDROLOGY)

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2011)

Shahrivar 2011

Prevalence of Self-Reported Erectile Dysfunction Among Urological Cases in Turkish Men

  • Zeki Bayraktar
  • Ihsan Atun

Urology Journal, Vol. 8 No. 3 (2011), 5 Shahrivar 2011 , Page 214-221
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v8i3.1135 Published: 2011-09-05

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of self-reported erectile dysfunction (ED) among urological cases in Turkish men. Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and January 2011, the diagnoses of 9780 men over 18 years old that presented to our urology polyclinic were reviewed. The 10 diseases with the highest frequency, the rate of the disease, and the intra-group ranking were determined in 18 to 39, ≥ 40-year-old, and in total. The rate of ED among urological cases was considered to be the self-reported ED prevalence. The findings were evaluated using the population-based (Turkey) ED prevalence found in the literature. Also, the prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) was evaluated in the Turkish population. This evaluation compared the ED and BPH prevalence. Results: The prevalence of ED (self-reported ED) was 1.9%, 8.2%, and 4.8% in the age groups of 18 to 39, ≥ 40-years, and total, respectively. The intra-group ranking of ED was 8th, 3rd, and 8th in the aforementioned groups, respectively. The most frequent disease was BPH in total and ≥ 40-year-old groups. The ratio of patients with BPH to ED was 6.1 (BPH/ED: 2250/366). The prevalence of ED (self-reported ED) as well as BPH significantly increased with age (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). Conclusion: The prevalence of ED in urological cases is relatively lower than expected. There is a discrepancy between the self-reported ED prevalence in urological cases and population-based ED prevalence.

  • SDI

How to Cite

Bayraktar, Z., & Atun, I. (2011). Prevalence of Self-Reported Erectile Dysfunction Among Urological Cases in Turkish Men. Urology Journal, 8(3), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v8i3.1135
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 356 times
  • SDI Downloaded: 254 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus