Return to Sports After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Narrative Review from a Holistic Perspective Return to Sports After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Journal of Clinical Physiotherapy Research,
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025),
15 November 2025
,
Page 1-6
https://doi.org/10.22037/jcpr.v10i1.50016
Abstract
Introduction: Achieving a successful return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains a significant challenge. Despite high patient expectations, only about 55% of athletes return to competitive sports, and up to 20% of those suffer a second ACL injury. Although various RTS test batteries have been developed to assess readiness and reduce re-injury risk, many athletes fail to meet these criteria, and passing them does not consistently prevent re-injury, indicating limited predictive validity. This narrative review critically evaluates RTS testing, rehabilitation quality, and the RTS continuum from a holistic perspective over the past 15 years.Methods: This narrative review synthesizes literature from the past 15 years, focusing on three core areas: 1) RTS testing protocols and their limitations, 2) the structure, content, and quality of rehabilitation programs, and 3) the dynamic and individualized nature of the RTS continuum.Results: Current RTS test batteries, while multidimensional, lack ecological validity and fail to reliably predict re-injury. Rehabilitation programs often underprepare athletes for sport-specific demands due to insufficient loading, lack of neurocognitive integration, and inadequate on-field progression. Psychological readiness, influenced by fear of re-injury and communication styles, is a critical yet often overlooked component. A holistic, individualized approach incorporating progressive strength training, external focus instruction, neurocognitive challenges, and on-field rehabilitation is essential for improving RTS outcomes. The RTS continuum model (OFR, RTT, RTC, RTP) emphasizes phased reintegration, supported by shared decision-making and ongoing monitoring.Conclusion: RTS after ACLR is a complex, individualized process. Enhancing RTS success requires ecologically valid testing, high-quality progressive rehabilitation, psychological support, neurocognitive training, and structured on-field progression. Future efforts should prioritize personalized rehabilitation strategies and long-term secondary prevention to ensure safer and more effective returns to sport.
- Anterior cruciate ligament, Reconstruction, Return to sport, Rehabilitation
How to Cite
References
Reference
1. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014 Aug;48(21):1543-52.
2. Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: The Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016 Jul;50(13):804-8.
3. Losciale JM, Zdeb RM, Ledbetter L, Reiman MP, Sell TC. The association between passing return-to-sport criteria and second anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2019 Feb;49(2):43-54.
4. Webster KE, Hewett TE. What is the evidence for and validity of return-to-sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2019 Jun;49(6):917-29.
5. Grindem H, Granan LP, Risberg MA, Engebretsen L, Forssblad M, Molster A, Aandahl MH, Aroen A. Knee laxity, graft failure, and lack of extensor strength increase the risk of poor outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 2- to 7-year follow-up. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013 May;41(5):1014-21.
6. Ebert JR, Davidson M, Janes GC, Ackland TR. Quadriceps strength and symmetry early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are associated with 12-month outcomes. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2016 Jul;46(7):522-30.
7. van Melick N, van Cingel REH, Brooijmans F, Neeter C, van Tienen T, Hullegie W, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG. Evidence-based clinical practice update: Practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016 Dec;50(24):1506-15.
8. Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, Visscher I, Otten E, Diercks RL, Lemmink KAPM. Improved neuromuscular control and enhanced performance may reduce anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: Sagittal plane knee biomechanics during a drop jump landing. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2009 Jan;39(1):12-23.
9. Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education. 2010 Jan;44(1):75-84.
10. Bæktoft van Weert M, Skovdal Rathleff M, Eppinga P, Møller Mølgaard C, Welling W. Using a target as external focus of attention results in a better jump-landing technique in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cross-over study. The Knee. 2023 Jun; 42:390-9.
11. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE. Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013 Jul;41(7):1549-58.
12. Nwachukwu BU, Adjei J, Rauck RC, Chahla J, Okoroha KR, Verma NN, Allen AA, Williams RJ. How much do psychological factors affect lack of return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019 May;7(5):13-23.
13. Grooms DR, Chaput MH, Diekfuss JA, Baumeister J, Myer GD. Neuroplasticity associated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2019 Dec;49(12):857-64.
14. Walker JM, Brunst CL, Chaput M, Wohl TR, Grooms DR. Integrating neurocognitive challenges into injury prevention training: A clinical commentary. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2021 Sep; 51:8-16.
15. Buckthorpe M, Della Villa F. Optimising the "mid-stage" training and testing process after ACL reconstruction. Sports Medicine. 2020 Apr;50(4):657-78.
16. Buckthorpe M, Villa FD, Villa SD, Roi GS. On-field rehabilitation Part 1: 4 pillars of high-quality on-field rehabilitation are restoring movement quality, physical conditioning, restoring sport-specific skills, and progressively developing chronic training load. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2019 Aug;49(8):565-9.
17. Rousanoglou EN, Boudolos K. The control-chaos continuum in rehabilitation: A new model for return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2020 Jul; 45:1-7.
18. Della Villa F, Della Villa S, Buckthorpe M, Grassi A, Zaffagnini S, Roi GS. Return to play after ACL reconstruction: The football-specific gradual transition from rehabilitation to team training. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020 Feb;28(2):373-82.
19. De Almeida AM, Silva PRS, Pedrinelli A, Hernandez AJ. Aerobic fitness in professional soccer players after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PLOS ONE. 2018 Mar;13(3):19-32.
20. Welling W, Gokeler A, Benjaminse A, Verhagen EA, Lemmink K. Have we forgotten our patient? An exploration of patient experiences after ACL reconstruction. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2022 May 19;31(8):993-9.
- Abstract Viewed: 82 times
- PDF Downloaded: 71 times