Evaluating diagnostic accuracy of Ovarian instant frozen sections compared to delayed paraffin embedded permanent sections
Researcher Bulletin of Medical Sciences,
Vol. 24 No. 1 (2019),
Introduction: Frozen section is mainly performed to determine malignity, so it is of fundamental importance to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of frozen sections performed for each group of tissues in order to reduce false diagnoses, unnecessary surgeries and following unwanted complications. This study is conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of frozen section performed on ovary tissue compared to permanent sections.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluate frozen sections performed at Taleghani hospital pathology department in five years and their results were compared with permanent sections’ results to calculate sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value. In cases which results were discordant, we check for probable reasons.
Results: 83 species were evaluated from patients with a mean age of 42.9 years; the smallest was 19 and the oldest was 86 years old (Std. dev: 12.84). 75 cases of frozen sections were benign (90.4%) and 8 cases were malignant. 73 cases of permanent sections were benign (88%) and 10 cases were malignant (12%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value rates were 66%, 100%, 100% and 96.55% respectively.
Conclusions: This study shows the importance of cooperation between pathologist and surgeons that they can prevent unnecessary surgeries. In our study the only cases of discordancy were borderline tumors and the diagnostic accuracy for all other species were perfect.
- Frozen section; Permanent section; Concordance; Discordance; Intraoperative consultation
How to Cite
2. Özdamar S, Bahadir B, Ekem T, Kertis G, Gün B, Numanoðlu G. Frozen section experience with emphasis on reasons for discordance. Turk J Cancer 2006;36(4):157- 61.
3. Patil P, Shukla S, Bhake A, Hiwale K. Accuracy of frozen section analysis in correlation with surgical pathology diagnosis. Int J Res Med Sci 2015; 3:399-404.
4. Silva RDP, Souto LRM, Matsushita GM, Matsushita MM. Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section tests for surgical diseases. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2011; 38(3).
5. Gal AA. The centennial anniversary of the frozen section technique at the Mayo Clinic. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005; 129(12):1532-35.
6. Sienko A, Allen TC, Zander DS, Cagle PT. Frozen section of lung specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005; 129(12):1602-9.
7. Ferreiro JA, Myers JL, Bostwick DG. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in surgical pathology: review of a 1-year experience with 24,880 cases at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Mayo Clin Proc 1995; 70(12):1137-41.
8. Makay O, Icoz G, Gurcu B, Ertan Y, Tuncyurek M, Akyildiz M, et al. The ongoing debate in thyroid surgery: should frozen section analysis be omitted? Endocr J 2007; 54(3):385-90.
9. Ahmad Z, Barakzai MA, Idrees R, Bhurgri Y. Correlation of intraoperative frozen section consultation with the final diagnosis at a referral center in Karachi, Pakistan. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2008; 51(4):469-73.
10. Raab SS, Tworek JA, Souers R, Zarbo RJ. The value of monitoring frozen section-permanent section correlation data over time. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130(3):337-42.
11. Niu Y, Fu XL, Yu Y, Wang PP, Cao XC. Intra-operative frozen section diagnosis of breast lesions: a retrospective analysis of 13,243 Chinese patients. Chin Med J 2007; 120(8):630-5.
12. Mahe E, Ara S, Bishara M, Kurian A, Tauqir S, Ursani N, et al. Intraoperative pathology consultation: error, cause and impact. Can J Surg 2013 Jun;56(3):E13-8.
13. Gephardt GN, Zarbo RJ. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultations. A college of American pathologists Q-Probes study of 90,538 cases in 461 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Sep; 120(9):804-9.
14. Geramizadeh B, Larijani TR, Owji S-M, Attaran SY, Torabinejad S, Aslani FS, et al. Accuracy of intra-operative frozen section consultation in south of Iran during four years. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010; 53(3):414.
15. Abbasi F, Yekta Z, Aryan A. Accuracy of frozen sections. Irn Jrnl of path.2012; 1:3-8.
16. White VA, Trotter MJ. Intraoperative consultation/final diagnosis correlation:relationship to tissue type and pathologic process. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006. 2008 Jan; 132(1):29-36.
17. Khoo JJ. An audit of intraoperative frozen section in Johor. The Med jrnl of Malaysia. 2004Mar; 59(1):50-5.
18. Novis DA, Gephardt GN, Zarbo RJ. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultation in small hospitals: a college of American pathologists Q-Probes study of 18,532 frozen section consultation diagnoses in 233 small hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006. 1996 Dec; 120(12):1087-93.
- Abstract Viewed: 0 times
- e18 Downloaded: 0 times