Predicting emotional divorce based on metacognitive beliefs and psychological flexibility
Researcher Bulletin of Medical Sciences,
Vol. 24 No. 1 (2019),
31 August 2020
Introduction: This study aimed to predict emotional divorce based on metacognitive beliefs and psychological flexibility.
Materials and Methods: The type of study was cross-sectional. The target population was the total married individuals in Tehran. Using cluster random sampling 467 married people (282 women, 185 man) were chosen to complete the Gottman emotional divorce scale, Meta Cognition Questionnaire (MCQ-30), acceptance and commitment inventory and demographic information sheet.
Results: findings showed that metacognitive beliefs and psychological flexibility had a significant relationship (p <0.01) with emotional divorce. These variables accounted for 24% of variance in emotional divorce. Negative metacognitions had a positive significant relationship with emotional divorce. In other words, by incremental level of negative metacognitions the rate of emotional divorce will increase. Also, positive metacognitions and psychological flexibility had a negative significant relationship with emotional divorce. Results showed that by increasing in level of psychological flexibility and applying Positive metacognitions instead of negative metacognitions the rate of emotional divorce will diminish.
Conclusion: The current study support empirical evidence that a significant relationship does exist between aforementioned constructs. Given the implications of this research, by modifying of metacognitive beliefs and increasing psychological flexibility, the marital relationship can be improved. Thereby diminishing emotional divorce in couples.
- Emotional divorce; Metacognitive beliefs; Psychological flexibility
How to Cite
2. Seltzer JA. Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of marriage and family. 2000;62(4):1247-68.
3. Afrasiabi F, Jafarizadeh MR. Study of the Relationship between Personal Factors and Emotional Divorce. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015;6(6 S6):406.
4. Fomby P, Cherlin AJ. Family instability and child well-being. American sociological review. 2007;72(2):181-204.
5. Tucker JS, Friedman HS, Schwartz JE, Criqui MH, Tomlinson-Keasey C, Wingard DL, et al. Parental divorce: Effects on individual behavior and longevity. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1997;73(2):381.
6. Jackson L. The Impact of Parental Divorce on Children's Confidence Levels in Young Adulthood. 2015.
7. Basem Abbas Al Ubaidi. The Psychological and Emotional Stages of Divorce. Family Medicine and Disease Prevention. 2017;3(3):6.
8. Anthony CJ, DiPerna JC, Amato PR. Divorce, approaches to learning, and children's academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis of mediated and moderated effects. Journal of school psychology. 2014;52(3):249-61.
9. Kaslow FW. Stages of divorce: A psychological perspective. Vill L Rev. 1980;25:718.
10. Seyed-Hossein S, Reza K, Seyed-Mahmoud M, Asiye R, Reza TM. Irrational Beliefs, Life Cycles of a Couple and Divorce. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2007;7(2):202-7.
11. Barzoki MH, Tavakoll M, Burrage H. Rational-Emotional ‘Divorce’in Iran. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2015;10(1):107-22.
12. Gottman JM. What predicts divorce?: The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes: Psychology Press; 2014.
13. Amato PR, Previti D. People's reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of family issues. 2003;24(5):602-26.
14. Clarke L, Berrington A. Socio-demographic predictors of divorce. London; 1999.
15. Sahebihagh MH, Khorshidi Z, Atri SB, Asghari M, Jafarabadi AHR. The rate of emotional divorce and predictive factors in nursing staff in north of Iran. International Journal of Women’s Health and Reproduction Sciences. 2018;6(2):174-80.
16. Talebpour A, Vaziri H, Marzdarani H. Evaluation affecting factors of emotional divorce (Case study: The perspective of higher education married staffs in Karaj Province in 2014). MAGNT Research Report (ISSN. 1444-8939). 3 (3): 459-467; 2015.
17. Kaplan A, Herbst A. Stratified patterns of divorce: Earnings, education, and gender. Demographic Research. 2015;32:949-82.
18. Robila M, Krishnakumar A. Effects of economic pressure on marital conflict in Romania. Journal of Family Psychology. 2005;19(2):246.
19. Mahmoudpour A, Farahbakhsh K, Balochzadeh E. Prediction of women’s marital commitment based on their attachment styles, self-compassion and distress tolerance. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2018;8(1):65-84.
20. Shiri MA, Ghanbaripanah A. Predict Marital Conflicts and Emotional Divorce based on the Character Strengths among spouses. International Journal of Fundamental Psychology and Social Sciences (IJFPSS). 2016;6(2):15-22.
21. Samadi Fard HR, Narimani M, Mikaeili N, Sheykholeslami A. The Role of Cognitive Avoidance Components and Metacognitive Belief in the Prediction of Spouses Emotional Divorce. journal of counseling research. 2016;15(59):38-57.
22. Samadifard H, Narimani M. The role of cognitive belief, fusion and distortion in predicting the general health of couples. J Community Health Res. 2017;6(3):132-40.
23. KAVOUSIAN J, HARIFI H, KARIMI K. THE EFFICACY OF ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY (ACT) ON MARITAL SATISFACTION IN COUPLES. 2017.
24. Dethier V, Heeren A, Bouvard M, Baeyens C, Philippot P. Embracing the Structure of Metacognitive Beliefs: Validation of the French Short Version of the Metacognitions Questionnaire. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2017;10(3):219-33.
25. Fisher P, Wells A. Metacognitive therapy: Distinctive features: Routledge; 2009.
26. Palm KM, Follette VM. The roles of cognitive flexibility and experiential avoidance in explaining psychological distress in survivors of interpersonal victimization. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2011;33(1):79-86.
27. Boulanger JL, Hayes SC, Pistorello J. Experiential avoidance as a functional contextual concept. Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic approach to etiology and treatment. 2010:107-36.
28. Schoenfeld A. Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. Colección Digital Eudoxus. 2009(7).
29. Hamidreza Samadifard. Prediction of Sexual Addiction of Couples Based on Meta-Cognitive Belief and Cognitive Fusion,. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences,. No 2, 2018;Vol 14, (3):183-8,.
30. Strosahl K, Wilson K. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. new york. Guilford Press; 1999.
31. Fariba Moradzadeh AP. The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Marital Satisfaction and Cognitive Flexibility Among Married Employees of the Welfare Office,. Iranian Nursing Scientific Association,. (2-2018);Volume 5, (Issue 6).
32. Samadi Fard HR NM, Mikaeili N, Sheykholeslami A,. The Role of Cognitive Avoidance Components and Metacognitive Belief in the Prediction of Spouses Emotional Divorce,. journal of counseling research 2016;15,((59),):8.
- Abstract Viewed: 0 times
- e14 Downloaded: 0 times