Biometrics and Health Law Institute; International Think-Tank of Human Dignity; ​Medical Ethics and Law Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Login
  • Register
  • Submit Manuscript

Bioethics and Health Law Journal (BHL)

  • Home
  • Journal Information
    • About the Journal
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact us
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
    • Search
  • Register
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Ethics
    • Ethical Requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Privacy Statement
  • Announcements
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): Continuous Volume
  4. Original/Research Article

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023)

Bahman 2026

Digital Memory and Children’s Right to Health: Reinterpreting the Right to Be Forgotten

  • mohammadMehdi seyednasseri

Bioethics and Health Law Journal (BHL), Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023), 16 Bahman 2026 , Page 1-14
https://doi.org/10.22037/bhl.v3i3.51847 Published: 2026-05-19

  • View Article
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

The persistence of personal data in digital environments has created new challenges for the protection of children’s fundamental rights, particularly the right to health understood as encompassing psychological well-being, personal development and dignity. This study examines the right to be forgotten as an emerging legal mechanism capable of safeguarding children’s right to health in the age of permanent digital memory. This research adopts a doctrinal and analytical-descriptive approach in international law. Relevant legal instruments, judicial decisions and interpretative documents including the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union are examined to evaluate the normative relationship between the right to be forgotten and the child’s right to health. The analysis demonstrates that the right to be forgotten functions not only as a data protection mechanism but also as a preventive safeguard against psychological harm, reputational damage and long-term developmental risks arising from the permanent accessibility of childhood data. A child-centered interpretation of this right strengthens the protection of mental health, identity formation and informational autonomy. The study concludes that the right to be forgotten should be recognized as an integral component of the child’s right to health in the digital environment. Effective realization of this right requires child-oriented legal standards, enhanced platform accountability and accessible mechanisms enabling children to regain control over their digital identities.

Keywords:
  • Right to be Forgotten
  • Children’s Right to Health
  • Digital Identity
  • Mental Health
  • Data Protection
  • International Human Rights Law

How to Cite

seyednasseri, mohammadMehdi. (2026). Digital Memory and Children’s Right to Health: Reinterpreting the Right to Be Forgotten. Bioethics and Health Law Journal (BHL), 3(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22037/bhl.v3i3.51847
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

1. Agarwala N. Children’s Privacy and the Ghost of Social Media Past. Columbia Human Rights Law Review. 2025; 56(1): 299-350.

2. Cofone I. Google v. Spain: A Right to Be Forgotten?. Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law. 2015; 15(1): 1-14.

3. Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), General comment No.25. 2021.

4. Council of Europe. Recommendation on the Rights of the Child in the Digital Environment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 2021.

5. Court of Justice of the European Union, Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González, Case C-131/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:317. 2014. para.92.

6. Court of Justice of the European Union, Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. AEPD and Mario Costeja González, Case C-131/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:317. 2014. para.93.

7. Court of Justice of the European Union, Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. AEPD and Mario Costeja González, Case C-131/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:317. 2014. para.94.

8. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Children’s Rights in the Digital Environment: Fundamentals for Good Policy Making. Luxembourg: EUR LEX; 2022.

9. Godin J, Lamontagne P. Deletion-Compliance in the Absence of Privacy. ArXiv Preprint. 2022; arXiv: 2201.03499.

10. Goldsteen A, Douek T, Cohen Y, Gokhman I, Ackerman OK, Katsovich G, et al. Forgotten @ Scale: A Practical Solution for Implementing the Right to Be Forgotten in Large Scale Systems. ArXiv Preprint. 2019; arXiv: 1907.05012.

11. Kadastik M. Child Right to Privacy and Social Media: Personal Information Oversharing by Parents. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics. 2021; 14(2): 101-122.

12. Kamarinou D, Millard C, Singh J, Treseler R. Children’s Privacy in the Digital Age: US and UK Experiences and Policy Responses. In: Children’s Privacy in the Digital Age: US and UK Experiences and Policy Responses. Cham: Springer; 2023. p.67-84.

13. Kardefelt-Winther D. Health, Privacy and Trust in a Digital World. London: UNICEF UK; 2020.

14. Kulk S, Zuiderveen Borgesius F. Privacy, Freedom of Expression and the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. p.301-320.

15. Leaver T. Sharenting, Intimate Surveillance and the Right to Be Forgotten. In: The Routledge Companion to Digital Media and Children. London: Routledge; 2020. p.287-304.

16. Livingstone S, Third A. The State of the World’s Children 2017: Children in a Digital World. New York: UNICEF; 2017.

17. Livingstone S, Stoilova M, Nandagiri R. Children’s Data and Privacy Online: An Evidence Review. London: London School of Economics; 2018.

18. OECD. The State of Digital Youth: Youth and Data in a Digital World. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2022.

19. Palfrey J, Gasser U. Towards a Digital Bill of Rights for Children: Frameworks and Governance. Journal of Internet Policy. 2024; 8(1): 4.

20. Pawelczyk M, Leemann T, Biega A. On the Trade-Off between Actionable Explanations and the Right to Be Forgotten. ArXiv Preprint. 2022; arXiv: 2206.11770.

21. Lievens E, Vander Maelen C. A Child’s Right to Be Forgotten: Letting Go of the Past and Embracing the Future? Latin American Law Review. 2019; (2): 61-79.

22. Seyednasseri MM. From Google Spain to Gen Alpha: The Right to Be Forgotten and the Digital Protection of Children under International Law. Opinio Juris. 2025. Available from: https://opiniojuris.org/2025/10/15/from-google-sp ain-to-gen-alpha-the-right-to-be-forgotten-and-the -digital-protection-of-children-under-internationa l-law/.

23. Seyednasseri MM. General Comment No.27 of the Committee on the Rights of the Child and the Transformation of the Concept of Child-Centred Justice. Opinio Juris. 2025. Available from: https://opiniojuris.org/2025/08/28/general-comment-no-27-of-the-committee-on-the-rights-o f-the-child-and-the-transformation-of-the-concept-of-child-centered-justice/.

24. Third A. Children’s Rights in the Digital Age: A Download from Children around the World. New York: UNICEF; 2024.

25. UNESCO/OECD. Children’s Data and Algorithmic Systems - Governance Challenges. Working Paper; 2023.

26. UNICEF, Kardefelt-Winther D, Day E, Berman G, Witting SK, Bose A. Encryption, Privacy and Children’s Right to Protection from Harm. Innocenti Working Paper WP 2020-14. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti; 2020.

27. Vilella S, Ruffo G. (De) Indexing and the Right to Be Forgotten. ArXiv Preprint. 2025.

28. Wang W. Difference between the Real World and Virtual World. Proceedings. 2020; 47(1): 1-6.

29. Yates C. Protecting Children by Limiting the Right to Profit from ‘Sharenting’. Vanderbilt University Research Paper. 2023; 25(4): 845-870.

30. Watchlist for Children and Armed Conflict/ Child Rights NGOs. Annual analyses and policy briefs documenting trends in child protection and recommendations (reports). 2022-24.

31. Youm KH, Park A. The Right to Be Forgotten: Google Spain as a Benchmark for Free Speech versus Privacy?. Chicago Journal of International Law. 2023; 24(1): 167-186.

32. Youn S. Wanted: The Right to Be Forgotten (Name Removal Request). Edited by Livingstone S, Drotner K, Schrøder KC, de Block L. In: Children’s Data and Privacy Online. London: London School of Economics; 2008.

  • Abstract Viewed: 41 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 3.0. Design and publishing by SBMU journals. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS. 

 Sitemap | ISSN-ONLINE: 2538-3272

Support Contact: dr.taheri@sbmu.ac.ir 

 

Powered by OJSPlus