Assessment of neuropsychiatric indicators in children and adolescents with primary brain tumors and other brain space occupying lesions before and after surgery
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology,
Vol. 16 No. 3 (2022),
16 July 2022
,
Page 145-156
https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v16i1.31457
Abstract
Objective
Cognitive abilities may be impaired due to brain lesions in children and adolescents. This study aimed to investigate neuropsychiatric indicators in children and adolescents with primary brain tumor and other brain space occupying lesions (SOL) before and after surgical procedure.
Methods & materials
the current study is a pre and post study which was conducted on 81 patients with brain space occupying lesions aged less than 18. Patients with metastatic brain tumors were excluded. The study was performed between 20 December 2016 to 20 December 2017 on patients hospitalized in neurosurgery ward of Imam Reza university hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Before and after surgical procedure, Digit span forward and backward Task (to assess working memory), Stroop task and Trail Making Task A & B (to assess attention) and Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (to assess Visual Spatial Memory) were done. Then, scores of tests were compared with normal values as well as the post-surgery scores.
Results
the most prevalent type of space occupying brain lesion was medulloblastoma and the most common region of involvement was posterior fossa tumor. Scores of all tests after surgery comparing to before surgery were significantly improved (P<0.05). In assessment of Digit span forward and backward Task with standard scores, there was no significant difference among scores of patients before surgery with the standard value (P>0.05). Regarding scores of various stages of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure Test, the scores of immediate recall stage was significantly low (P<0.05). Among Trail Making Task A & B and stroop task, before surgery, just the Trail Making Task A & B was significantly increased (P<0.05). Scores of Trail Making Task A was significantly higher in patients with medulloblastoma and anatomically in left temporal tumors which indicate greater damage of attention field (P<0.05). In addition, in cerebellar tumor, scores of immediate recall stage of Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure Test was significantly lower (P<0.05).
Conclusions
Visuo-Spatial Memory and attention in pre-surgery assessments was significantly impaired comparing to general population (P<0.05). Working memory, Visuo-Spatial Memory and attention showed improvement comparing to pre-surgery. Deficits in attention domain was greater in medulloblastoma.
- Brain tumors
- neuropsychiatric impairments
- Visual Spatial Memory
- working memory
- attention
How to Cite
References
2. Duong LM, McCarthy BJ, McLendon RE, et al. (2012). Descriptive epidemiology of malignant and nonmalignant primary spinal cord, spinal meninges, and cauda equina tumors. Cancer, 118(17), 4220-7.
3. Cha S. (2006). Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 27(3), 475-87.
4. Council NR. (2003). Childhood cancer survivorship: improving care and quality of life. J United States, 85, 9-11.
5. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Farah P, et al. (2013). CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2006-2010. Neuro Oncol, 15(2), 1-5.
6. Turner CD, Rey-Casserly C, Liptak CC (2009). Late effects of therapy for pediatric brain tumor survivors. J Child Neurol, 24(11), 1455-63.
7. Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, et al. (2006). Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med, 355(15), 1572-82.
8. Zeltzer LK, Recklitis C, Buchbinder D, et al. (2009). Psychological status in childhood cancer survivors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol, 27(14), 23-36.
9. D. Harvey PH. Clinical applications of neuropsychological assessment. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Mar; 14(1): 91–99.
10. Maree Dwan T, Ownsworth T , Chambers S , Walker DG , Shum DH . Neuropsychological Assessment of Individuals with Brain Tumor: Comparison of Approaches Used in the Classification of Impairment. Front Oncol. 2015; 5: 56.
11. Reitan RM. Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8(3):271-6.
12. Williams JMG, Mathews A, MacLeod C. The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol Bull. 1996;120(1):3.
13. Waber DP, Holmes JM. Assessing children's copy productions of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1985;7(3):264-80.
14. Wechsler D. Wechsler memory scale. 1945.
15. Giovagnoli AR1, Boiardi A. Cognitive impairment and quality of life in long-term survivors of malignant brain tumors. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1994 Dec;15(9):481-8.
16. Hoffnung DS. The Role of Neuropsychology in the Assessment and Management of CNS Tumors. Clin Oncol. 2016; 1: 1065.
17. Tombaugh TN. Trail Maiking Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 2004; 19(2):203-14.
18. Canham R, Smith SL, Tyrrell AM, editors. Automated scoring of a neuropsychological test: the rey osterrieth complex figure. Euromicro Conference, 2000 Proceedings of the 26th; 2000: IEEE.
19. Palmo R, Casals-Coll M, Sanchez-Benavides G, Quintana M, Manero RM, Rognoni T, Calvo L, et al. Spanish normative studise in young adults (NEURONORMA young adults project): Norms for Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (copy and memory) and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test. Neurologia, 2013; 28(4): 226-235.
20. Orangi m, Atefvahid M, Ashayeri H. Standardization of the Revised Wechsler Memory Scale in Shiraz. IJPCP, 2002; 7(4): 56-66.
21. Robinson KE, Pearson MM, Cannistraci CJ, Anderson AW, Kuttesch JF, Jr., Wymer K, et al. Functional neuroimaging of working memory in survivors of childhood brain tumors and healthy children: Associations with coping and psychosocial outcomes. Child Neuropsychol. 2015;21(6):779-802.
22. Barzilai O, Ben Moshe S, Sitt R, Sela G, Shofty B, Ram Z. Improvement in cognitive function after surgery for low-grade glioma. J Neurosurg. 2018:1-9.
23. Satoer D, Vincent A, Smits M, Dirven C, Visch-Brink E. Spontaneous speech of patients with gliomas in eloquent areas before and early after surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013;155(4): 92-685.
24. Satoer D, Vork J, Visch-Brink E, Smits M, Dirven C, Vincent A. Cognitive functioning early after surgery of gliomas in eloquent areas. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(5):831-8.
25. Talacchi A, Santini B, Savazzi S, Gerosa M. Cognitive effects of tumour and surgical treatment in glioma patients. J Neurooncol. 2011;103(3):54-91.
26. Yoshii Y, Tominaga D, Sugimoto K, Tsuchida Y, Hyodo A, Yonaha H, et al. Cognitive function of patients with brain tumor in pre-and postoperative stage. Surg Neurol. 2008;69(1):51-61.
27. Dwan TM, Ownsworth T, Chambers S, Walker DG, Shum DH. Neuropsychological assessment of individuals with brain tumor: comparison of approaches used in the classification of impairment. Frontiers in oncology. 2015;5:56.
28. Bosma I, Douw L, Bartolomei F, Heimans JJ, van Dijk BW, Postma TJ, et al. Synchronized brain activity and neurocognitive function in patients with low-grade glioma: a magnetoencephalography study. Neuro-oncology. 2008;10(5):734-44.
29. Ek L, Almkvist O, Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Stragliotto G, Smits A. Early cognitive impairment in a subset of patients with presumed low-grade glioma. Neurocase. 2010;16(6):503-11.
30. Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, Barani IJ, Baumert BG, Brown PD, et al. Challenges relating to solid tumour brain metastases in clinical trials, part 1: patient population, response, and progression. A report from the RANO group. The Lancet Oncology. 2013;14(10):e396-e406.
31. Wefel JS, Vardy J, Ahles T, Schagen SB. International Cognition and Cancer Task Force recommendations to harmonise studies of cognitive function in patients with cancer. The lancet oncology. 2011;12(7):703-8.
- Abstract Viewed: 293 times