Predicting the theory of mind precursors based on parenting styles and language skills in preschool children
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology,
Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021),
1 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v15i2.23235
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to examine the association between language skills and parenting styles and three levels of theory of mind in Iranian preschool children.
Materials & Methods
The sample consisted of 98 preschool Iranian children (aged 5-6) from Karaj province, Iran. While theory of mind test and test of language development (Told-p: 4) were administrated with children, their mothers were asked to answer a parenting style questionnaire.
Results
Multivariate regression analysis showed a differential relationship between three levels of theory of mind, language skills and parenting styles. The results indicated that the theory of mind were predicted by most of the language skills and permissiveness parenting styles (P < 0. 01). False belief understanding was predicted only by morphological completion (p < 0.01). In addition, word articulation and authoritative parenting style were observed to predict ability to understand second order theory of mind (R2 = 28%).
Conclusion
The pattern of relationships between language and theory of mind in Persian language seems similar to previous studies in other languages. Language may play a dual role in theory of mind, such that; whereas for the first (basic) and the third (advanced) levels of theory of mind, language skills (such as relational vocabulary, morphological completion and word articulation) are among of those important prerequisites, for the medium level (false belief), syntactical skills are mostly important. In addition, it seems that authoritative parenting styles could facilitate the development of higher-order abilities related to theory of mind.
- Theory of mind
- Language
- Parenting
- Preschool children
How to Cite
References
Doherti M. Theory of mind: How children understand others' thoughts and feelings. New York: Psychology Press. 2009.
Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 1985;21(1):37-46.
Baird JA, Astington JW. The role of mental state understanding in the development of moral cognition and moral action. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev; 2004(103):37-49.
Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. (1993). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Muris P, Steerneman P, Meesters C, Merckelbach H, Horselenberg R, van den Hogen T, et al. The TOM test: A new instrument for assessing theory of mind in normal children and children with pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord1999;29(1):67-80.
Charman T, Baron-Cohen S. Understanding photos, models, and beliefs: A test of the modularity thesis of theory of mind. Cogn Dev 1995;10(2):287-98.
Scholl BJ, Leslie AM. Modularity, development and ‘theory of mind’. Mind Lang. 1999;14(1):131-53.
Jenkins JM, Astington JW. Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Dev Psychol 1996;32(1):70-78.
Pears KC, Moses LJ. Demographics, parenting, and theory of mind in preschool children. Soc Dev 2003;12(1):1-20.
Astington JW, Jenkins JM. A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Dev Psychol 1999;35(5):1311-1320.
Milligan K, Astington JW, Dack LA. Language and theory of mind: meta‐analysis of the relation between language ability and false‐belief understanding. Child Dev 2007;78(2):622-646.
Ruffman T, Slade L, Devitt K, Crowe E. What mothers say and what they do: The relation between parenting, theory of mind, language and conflict/cooperation. Br. J. Dev. Psychol 2006;24(1):105-124.
Ruffman T, Perner J, Parkin L. How parenting style affects false belief understanding. Soc Dev 1999;8(3):395-411.
Hughes C, Devine RT. Individual differences in theory of mind from preschool to adolescence: Achievements and directions. Child Dev Perspect 2015; 9(3):149-53.
15. Foster-Cohen SH. An introduction to child language development. Pearson Education; 1999. London (20-32).
. Steerneman WJ. Theory-of-mind-screening-schaal [Theory of mind screening scale]. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant , 1994. (30-50).
De Villiers J. The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua. 2007;117(11):1858-1878.
De Villiers JG, Pyers JE. Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cogn Dev 2002;17(1):1037-1060.
Schick B, de Villiers P, de Villiers J, Hoffmeister R. Language and theory of mind: a study of deaf children. Child Dev 2007;78(2):376-396
Miller CA. Developmental relationships between language and theory of mind. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006;15(2):142-54.
De Villiers JG, De Villiers PA. Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. Children's reasoning and the mind 2000;14:191-228.
Spanoudis G. Theory of mind and specific language impairment in school-age children. J. Commun. Disord 2016; 1;61:83-96.
Berk LE. Exploring lifespan development: Pearson; 2017.
Vinden PG. Parenting attitudes and children's understanding of mind: A comparison of Korean American and Anglo-American families. Cogn Dev 2001;16(3):793-809.
Hughes C, Deater‐Deckard K, Cutting AL. ‘Speak roughly to your little boy’? Sex Differences in the Relations Between Parenting and Preschoolers’ Understanding of Mind. Soc Dev 1999;8(2):143-60
Steerneman WJ. Theory-of-mind-screening-schaal: Garant; 1994.
Ghomrani A, Alborzi S, Khair M. Realiability and validity of theory of mind test among mental retardation and normal students in Iran. Journal of Psychology 2006;10(2):181-99. [Persian]
Buri JR. Parental authority questionnaire. J Pers Assess, 1991;57(1):110-9.
Reitman D, Rhode PC, Hupp SD, Altobello C. Development and validation of the parental authority questionnaire–revised. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2002;24(2):119-127.
Besharat MA. Azizi K, Poursharifi H. The Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Children's Perfectionism in a Sample of Iranian Families. Journal of family research 2011; 7(2);145-160. [Persian].
Newcomer PL, Hammill DD. TOLD-P: 4: Test of Language Development. Primary: Pro-Ed; 2008.
Hassanzadeh S, Minaee A. Normalizing test of language development. Research on execptional children. 2002;1(2):119-34 [Persian].
Ruffman T, Slade L, Crowe E. The relation between children's and mothers’ mental state language and theory‐of‐mind understanding. Child Dev 2002;73(3):734-51.
Ekman P. An argument for basic emotions. Cogn Emot 1992;6(3-4):169;200-229.
Lind SE, Bowler DM. Language and theory of mind in autism spectrum disorder: the relationship between complement syntax and false belief task performance. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 2009;39(6):929-937.
Fisher N, Happe F, Dunn J. The relationship between vocabulary, grammar, and false belief task performance in children with autistic spectrum disorders and children with moderate learning difficulties. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2005;46(4):409-19.
Bloom P, German TP. Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition 2000;77(1):25-31.
Happe FG. The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Dev. 1995;66(3):843-855.
Brooks R, Meltzoff AN. Connecting the dots from infancy to childhood: A longitudinal study connecting gaze following, language, and explicit theory of mind. J. Exp. Child Psychol 2015;130:67-78.
- Abstract Viewed: 617 times