Quality of life in the elderly: A meta-synthesis
Keywords:
Phenomenology, Quality of life, The elderlyAbstract
For downloading the full-text of this article please click here.
Background and Objective: Most of the elderly suffer from chronic diseases and receive constant treatment, which can influence their quality of life. It is therefore crucial to gain a thorough understanding of the elderly’s quality of life with the aim of carrying out proper care and support interventions.
Method: This qualitative meta-synthesis investigated the concept of quality of life among the elderly and the factors that may influence it. Four qualitative, phenomenological studies focusing on the elderly’s quality of life were analyzed. Major themes were subsequently extracted and final interpretations were made. At the end, a conceptual framework was proposed for the associations among concepts, dimensions, and influential factors of the elderly’s quality of life. All ethical issues were observed in this study and the researchers declared no conflict of interests.
Results: The results indicated that quality of life in the elderly is a complicated and abstract concept consisting of six main dimensions: internal individual factors, external individual factors, health, familial experiences, social interactions, and environmental factors.
Conclusion: Physical health in the elderly relies on individuals’ independence, free will, and internal individual factors (including the degree of the interaction between the senior and religious/spiritual resources, which constitute individuals’ mental health). Religious and spiritual resources are so integral during old age that they can compensate for the lack of familial and social support. Thus, connection with God will remove loneliness among the elderly, help them adapt themselves to their condition, and improve their quality of life.
For downloading the full-text of this article please click here.
Please cite this article as: Esmaeili R, EsmaeiliM. Quality of life in the elderly: A meta-synthesis. J Res Relig Health. 2018; 4(2): 105- 116.
References
Sulmasy DP. The varieties of human dignity: a logical and conceptual analysis. Springer; 2013.
Darvishpour Kakhaki A, Abedsaeidi Z, Delavar A, Saeidalzakerin M. Autonomy in the elderly: a phenomenological study. Hakim Health Sys Res. 2010;4:1-10.
Esmaeili R. Dignity in Senior Citizen. Tehran: Shahid Beheshty University of Medical Sciences; 2014.
Mohammadinia N, Rezaei MA, Atashzadeh-Shoorideh F. Elderly peoples’ experiences of nursing homes in Bam city: A qualitative study. Electronic physician. 2017;9(8):5015.
Borglin G, Edberg A-K, Hallberg IR. The experience of quality of life among older people. Journal of aging studies. 2005;19(2):201-20.
Howell DM, Cleary KK. Rural seniors' perceptions of quality of life. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics. 2007;25(4):55-71.
Burke E, McCarron M, Carroll R, McGlinchey E, McCallion P. What it's like to grow older: the aging perceptions of people with an intellectual disability in Ireland. Mental Retardation. 2014;52(3):205-19.
Bowling A, Gabriel Z. Lay theories of quality of life in older age. Ageing & Society. 2007;27(6):827-48.
O'Neill T, Jinks C, Ong BN. Decision-making regarding total knee replacement surgery: a qualitative meta-synthesis. BMC health services research. 2007;7 (1) 52.
Esmaili R, Saeedi ZA, Ashktorab T. Concept of elderly dignity in nursing perspective: a systematic review. Medical History Journal. 2016;5(17):11-36.
Sanaei A, Nikbakht Nasrabadi A. Methods of Qualitative Researches in Medical sciences. Tehran: Baray Farda Publication; 2013.
Esmaeili R, Abedsaeedi Z, Ashktorab T. Dignity in senior citizen from nursing viewpoint; a review of studies. Adv Environ Biol. 2014;8:949-53.
Esmaili R, Ashktorab T, Esmaili M, Yazd HR, Jamalodini SH. Philosophy of human relationships and ethics in medical sciences. Medical Ethics Journal. 2016;5(16):79-93.
Puts M, Shekary N, Widdershoven G, Heldens J, Lips P, Deeg D. What does quality of life mean to older frail and non-frail community-dwelling adults in the Netherlands? Quality of life Research. 2007;16(2):263-77.
Esmaeili R, Abedsaeidi Z, Ashktorab T. The philosophy of human relationship and moral principle in medical sciences. Quarterly of Medical Ethics. 2011;5(16):79-93.
Levasseur M, Tribble DS-C, Desrosiers J. Meaning of quality of life for older adults: importance of human functioning components. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2009;49(2):e91-e100.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Under Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (June 20, 2003), cience-research Journal of Pizhūhish dar dīn va salāmat are fully compliant with open access mandates, by publishing its articles under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright of their work and can deposit their publication in any repository. This means that articles can be freely reused by the author and others as long as the article is properly cited. Published articles in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Journals can be deposited immediately into an online repository without any cost. This articles can be, printed, archived in a collection, included in course-packs, and distributed without restrictions. Please read the full Creative Commons License for further information.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
