Basir Eye health Research Center
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Policies
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Privacy Statement
  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Ethical Considerations
  • Copy Right Form
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit Article
  • COPE Compliance
  • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Spring
  4. Case Reports

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021)

December 2022

Large Difference in Latency of Visual Evoked Potential P100 Peak in Case of Pattern and Flash Stimulation in a Multiple Sclerosis Patient

  • Seyed Mohammad Masoud Shushtarian
  • Nazanin Fatemian

Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021), 14 December 2022 , Page 73-76
https://doi.org/10.22037/joos.v5i2.38511 Published: 2021-04-04

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

The visual evoked potential is one of the suitable techniques for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. There are two stimulation techniques, i.e., pattern reversal checkerboard and flash, to record visually evoked potential. Flash type of stimulation is used in patients with poor visual acuity.

Here we report the VEP recording of a multiple sclerosis patients with two types of stimulation and an extraordinarily significant P100 peak latency difference observed between the two types of stimulation.

Keywords:
  • Visual Evoked Potential
  • Pattern and Flash Stimulation
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • pdf

How to Cite

Shushtarian, S. M. M., & Fatemian, N. . (2021). Large Difference in Latency of Visual Evoked Potential P100 Peak in Case of Pattern and Flash Stimulation in a Multiple Sclerosis Patient. Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences, 5(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.22037/joos.v5i2.38511
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Shushtarian S, Yahyavi S. Study of visual evoked potentials during normal monthly cycle in normal female subjects. Biomedical sciences instrumentation. 1999;35:165-7.

Shushtarian S, Kalantari AS, Tajik F, Adhami-Moghadam F. Effect of occupational vibration on visual pathway measured by visual evoked potentials. Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences. 2017;1(5):7-11.

Sarzaeim F, Abdolalizadeh S, Shushtarian SMM, Shojaei A. Visual Evoked Potential Findings in Patients using Anti-Seizure Medicine. Journal of Ophthalmology and Research. 2022;5(3):123-6.

Ojani F, Shushtarian SMM, Shojaei A, Naghib J. Visual Evoked Potential Findings of Bardet-Biedl Syndrome. Journal of Ophthalmology and Research. 2021;4(3):254-7.

Keramti S, Ojani F, Shushtarian SMM, Shojaei A, Mohammad-Rabei H. Early Diagnosis of Pathological Changes in Visual System of Prolactinoma Patients Using Visual Evoked Potential. Journal of Ophthalmology and Research. 2021;4(3):289-93.

Hajibeygi R, Shushtarian SMM, Abolghasemi S. Visual Evoked Potential Findings of Sjogren's Syndrome. Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences.4(1):13-7.

Sarzaeim F, Hashemzehi M, Shushtarian SMM, Shojaei A. Visual Evoked Potential Findings in Road Drilling Machine laborers. Journal of Ophthalmology and Research. 2022;5:43-7.

Shushtarian SMM, Naghib SJ, Adhami-Moghadam F, Shojaei A. Diplopia and Blurry Vision Following Refractive Eye Surgery: a Comorbidity Case Report. Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences. 2020;4(1):40-2.

Sarzaeim F, Hashemzehi M, Shushtarian SMM, Shojaei A, Naghib J. Flash Visual Evoked Potential as a Suitable Technique to Evaluate the Extent of Injury to Visual Pathway Following Head Trauma. Journal of Ophthalmology and Research. 2022;5:20-3.

Shushtarian SMM, Naser M, Adhami-Moghadam F, Shojaei A. Severe Headache Initiated by Flash Stimulation during Visual Evoked Potential Recording in a Patient with Monocular Optic Neuritis and History of Migraine Headache. Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences. 2017;1(4):36-9.

Shushtarian SMM. Suitable Stimulation Technique to Record Visual Evoked Potential in Migraine Patients. Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences. 2020;4(2):41-5.

Naser M, Shushtarian S, Abdolhoseinpour H, Davari T. Selection of suitable visual stimulator for recording of Visual Evoked Potential in photophobia patients. Indian journal of applied research. 2014;49:112-17.

  • Abstract Viewed: 115 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 151 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus