Basir Eye health Research Center
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Policies
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Privacy Statement
  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Ethical Considerations
  • Copy Right Form
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit Article
  • COPE Compliance
  • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): Winter
  4. Original Articles

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018)

January 2018

Evaluation of Optic Nerve Head Examination in a Resident Based Hospital

  • Maryam Yadgari
  • Mina Dargahi
  • Akram Ali Rezaee
  • Feras Alesmail
  • Ali Reza Haghi
  • Arezoo Astaraki

Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018), 1 January 2018 , Page 22-25
https://doi.org/10.22037/joos.v2i1.28554 Published: 2018-01-09

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of glaucomatous optic neuropathy diagnosis in a resident based hospital. 

Patients and Methods:  Four hundred twenty eyes of 210 patients underwent ocular examination including intra ocular pressure and optic nerve head measurements by third and fourth year residents and suspect cases were referred to a glaucoma specialist for validation. After reevaluation by the specialist a comparison between these two examination results was performed to evaluate the over diagnosis of disease by residents.
Results: In this prospective study, eighteen eyes out of 420 evaluated eyes were diagnosed as either glaucoma suspect (14 eyes) or glaucoma (4 eyes) by residents. After reevaluation by the glaucoma specialist only one eye had suspect optic nerve head which was referred for optic nerve head imaging. All other eyes had normal optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer in examination by the specialist.
Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate a high rate of glaucomatous optic neuropathy over diagnosis by third and fourth year ophthalmology residents. Further studies are needed to find if this over diagnosis is related to poor training or anxiety among residents to miss a real case of glaucoma.

Keywords: Glaucoma, Examination, Optic Nerves, Diagnosis.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Yadgari, M., Dargahi, M., Ali Rezaee, A., Alesmail, F., Haghi, A. R., & Astaraki, A. (2018). Evaluation of Optic Nerve Head Examination in a Resident Based Hospital. Journal of Ophthalmic and Optometric Sciences, 2(1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.22037/joos.v2i1.28554
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Susanna R Jr, Vessani RM. New findings in the evaluation of the optic disc in glaucoma diagnosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18(2):122-8.

Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(10):1492-9.

Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(1):62-5.

Deleón-Ortega JE, Arthur SN, McGwin G Jr, Xie A, Monheit BE, Girkin CA. Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(8):3374-80.

Hertzog LH, Albrecht KG, LaBree L, Lee PP. Glaucoma care and conformance with preferred practice patterns. Examination of the private, community-based ophthalmologist. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(7):1009-13.

. Quigley HA, Friedman DS, Hahn SR. Evaluation of practice patterns for the care of open-angle glaucoma compared with claims data: the Glaucoma Adherence and Persistency Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(9):1599-606.

Law SK, Tamboli DA, Ou Y, Giaconi JA, Caprioli J. Development of a resident training module for systematic optic disc evaluation in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(9):601-7.

  • Abstract Viewed: 150 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 122 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus